Picnicking under the Sewage Outflow: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
Dec 27, 2005 77 Replies
R
Roy L. Fuchs
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:35:20 GMT, not i Gave us:
Some retard that knows absofuckinglutely nothing about Usenet felt that top posting this garbage would mean something to someone... anyone. Wrong again.
formatting link
formatting link
You're an idiot. You aren't even using Outhouse Express, and you're still an idiot.
Top posting is bad, idiot. Retarded even.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
R
Roy L. Fuchs
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:59:24 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@eskimo.com (Mark Zenier) Gave us:
Here it is as text, which is how you should have posted it.
The purpose of this newsgroup is to create a forum for discussing, posting, requesting and using schematics.
Postings may include, but will not be limited to:
1 Graphic Images [Any Form}
2 Request for specific or general schematics
Discussion of schematics posted or needed.
The group is unmoderated.
END CHARTER.
RATIONALE: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic Many people are hobbyist, and as such, they create electronic designs that are not for profit. These people do, from time to time, create web and ftp sites to share electronic schematics. alt.binaries.schematics.electronic would be the place for all people to uploaded/download/request/critique/and discuss schematics.
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic. would also be great because in many existing newsgroups people do ask for a place to get schematics often. Specifically sci.electronics.basics has several messages per week on that very idea.
The new hierarchy created by this creation will provide a jumping off point for other groups that deal with schematics.
The purpose of this newsgroup is to create a forum for discussing, posting, requesting and using schematics.
Postings may include, but will not be limited to:
1 Graphic Images [Any Form}
2 Request for specific or general schematics
Discussion of schematics posted or needed.
The group is unmoderated.
END CHARTER.
RATIONALE: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic Many people are hobbyist, and as such, they create electronic designs that are not for profit. These people do, from time to time, create web and ftp sites to share electronic schematics. alt.binaries.schematics.electronic would be the place for all people to uploaded/download/request/critique/and discuss schematics.
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic. would also be great because in many existing newsgroups people do ask for a place to get schematics often. Specifically sci.electronics.basics has several messages per week on that very idea.
The new hierarchy created by this creation will provide a jumping off point for other groups that deal with schematics.
For your newsgroups file: alt.binaries.schematics.electronic Binary postings of electronic schematics
- booster -
Potentially worthwhile newsgroup, created 4 March 1997, has some propagation problems. Sysadmins, please add this group.
"All governments enlarge upon and extend their powers. Under
government, the rights of individuals constantly diminish."
-- Fred Woodworth
R
Roy L. Fuchs
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:51:57 -0700, Jim Thompson Gave us:
Read the charter again, dude.
Newturd was not posting schematics.
M
Mark Zenier
In addition to freebin.readnews.com, there's biggulp.readfreenews.net . Both are free/open read only news servers that carry binaries. They're test servers (and free advertising) for pay services (readnews and octanews) so are rationed in various ways, usually by the number of users and connections per user.
Mark Zenier snipped-for-privacy@eskimo.com Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)
M
Mark Zenier
Huh?
The difference between what I posted and what you posted was that I added a '>' to the start of each (non-blank) line (to keep any control messages from being interpreted by defective news transport software).
You appear to have some sort of comprehension problem.
Mark Zenier snipped-for-privacy@eskimo.com Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)
S
Spokesman
I see nothing here mentioning whether to post at the top or at the bottom.
Perhaps we should post both at the top AND at the bottom so little roy will be happy.
Standard practice on Usenet is bottom posting. See the RFCs.
Good practice includes 'interspersed' posting.
Top-posting is rarely criticised where a simple quick reply ( without the likelihood of follow-ups ) is required though.
Graham
R
Roy L. Fuchs
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:18:39 GMT, "Spokesman" Gave us:
You are a "spokesman" for NOTHING. You are a total retard.
Put THAT in your bottom.
R
Roy L. Fuchs
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:07:15 +0000, Pooh Bear Gave us:
Top posting is lame. In ANY usage in Usenet. It ain't email.
formatting link
formatting link
D
Don Bowey
Hey. Nunayour-roy........ You can change your name, but the real person keeps showing through.
J
John Larkin
He used to be Dark Matter, or Damp Madder, or something, too. Just look for keywords "asswipe" and "retard."
John
J
John Larkin
Convention deficits? Are those people who don't go to enough trade shows?
John
D
Don Bowey
How about this? Top and Bottom posting.....
Well, I knew just a little bait would put you on my hook, sucker (as in bottom-feeder).
N
not i
?
R
Roy L. Fuchs
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 20:04:22 GMT, not i Gave us:
You are a top posting, ZERO content, Usenet retard.
R
Roy L. Fuchs
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 12:44:24 -0800, Don Bowey Gave us:
Likewise, you top posting, ZERO Usnet IQ, know nothing, ZERO content, IDIOT!
R
Roy L. Fuchs
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 13:06:26 -0800, John Larkin Gave us:
Then, make a list of all the folks that I called that, and you'll have a listing of some of the most retarded Usenet convention deficient idiots in existence!
S
Spokesman
Are you jerking roy-boys chain?
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.