Hi, Im looking at using a parametric method for a phase detector, The source (~4mhz) is already very strong but the sideband, @ 1-10hz, is extremely low, I am considering using a quartz crystal as the most sensitive slope detector but to get a significant signal to noise ratio I would need a crystal with a Q of over a million. I dont expect acheiving such a high Q is practical, unless cooling it drasticaly would help ?
The main noise problem is 1/f noise especialy as a high Q circuit would need a high impedance amplifier and a mosfet would have too high 1/f noise at
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
D
doug dwyer
In message , colin writes
I understand that you intend to apply a 4MHz signal with low sidebands to a high Q crystal offset slightly so that pahse modulation will appear as amplitude modulation and then perhaps employ a low frequency speactrum analyser to look at the phase noise. Is this the idea? If so: A good quality 4MHZ crystal wcan have a Q approaching 1000000. All depends on the diameter/contour surface polish and the quality of quartz used. The crystal could be operated at its series resonance and terminated in
50 ohms so that a
C
colin
sensitive
need a
is
need
although
they
Hi, thanks, yes thats right :)
well it is actualy a modulation signal im trying to detect rather than just noise but it is very similar problem, of course the phase noise of the reference oscillator is a big issue but I intend to try and null most of that out I hope.
I'l go looking for some nice shiny quartz rocks... I chose 4mhz as it seemed they had the lowest series resistance for the frequency coresponding to highest Q although manafacturers dont list Q on a per frequency basis, its generally 20k for off the shelf types, im not sure if its advantagous to use an overtone or not. Im not sure if i can get any better ones, but the ones i bought seem to demonstrate a higher Q than anticipated from the simulation.
aha, I have looked at using it in parrellel mode trying to use the considerably high voltage generated from resonance to improve snr before detection, although I was woried about destroying the crystal I can easily see 50v pk-pk. I will experiment with the series mode in ltspice, the problem with most
1nv/hz^-2 amplifiers is 1/f noise is stil quite high as much as 1uv total below 10hz, not that many manafacturers seem to specify noise below 10hz, but certainly it has meant i have had to rethink things, I was hoping a parametric amp would avoid the 1/f problem unless i am mistaken here ? I have managed to get significant gain using the reactance of a varactor in a tuned circuit, but there still the problem of the preceeding detector diode.
so could a 400mhz cavity have a higher Q ?
Ive seen test aplication where the same type of oscillator is used as the reference if it is a VCXO of course. Ive tried using a PLL with a OCXO but this proved disapointing, of course one never fuly knows if its the topology used or just unlucky construction with such low snr, from what I can gather I think 1/f noise can be degraded with handling/soldering etc.
Thats quite impressive.
I will look into this with interest.
thnks
Colin =^.^=
D
doug dwyer
In message , colin writes
Intrinsic acoustic loss is per cycle so ltimate q reduces from about
10000000 at 1 MHz to 100000 at 100MHz. Modern crystals use grown quartz which can be much lower Q however the best grown approaches the ultimate. A 5 MHz 5th overtone will have a q of 1 to 2oooooo but cannot be driven hard.
dd
C
colin
is
high Q
would
at
at
doubt
after a
appear
just
seemed
its
use
ones i
simulation.
easily
in
analyser.
crystal
construction
degraded
overcome
noise.
Hi again,
I looked at using series resoance with a 50ohm resistor but the much lower voltage means a much smaler signal even tho the slope is higher, I did consider a curent transformer aproach but think it wpould be pushing things a bit to actualy get more SNR.
I looked at auto zero amplifiers and found they auto cancel the 1/f noise along with the dc offest, the AD8552 looks superb, very low voltage noise
1-10hz and very low input curent/noise too, so i can use a highly tuned high impedance/high voltage section to give maximum signal, so i got one of these now, (I already had one in my parts box !) and boarding it up now.
I couldnt find much on error multipliers, maybe il look some more ...
Colin =^.^=
D
doug dwyer
In message , colin writes
I looked and did not find, the technique was to multiply a 1MHz test signal to 10MHz mix with 9 MHz clean reference filter the resultant 1MHz and multiply again to 10MHz mix with the reference again can be done 4
0r 5 times.with increasing sidebands the exact opposite to dividing. Various manufactrurers in the 60s
dd
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.