The "fact" that Dan has more money than I do isn't an established fact. Dan may know how much money he has, but he doesn't know how much money I have. and I have no plans to make that public.
At best it is a hypothesis, not backed up by any kind of evidence, which makes Dan a liar.
The proposition that Harvard was a better University than Melbourne from 1960 to 1970 (when I was a student as the University of Melbourne) does depend on what you mean by "better". "More prestigious" basically means more impressive and more glamorous, and you go to a university to get educated, rather than glamorised. I came out of Melbourne with a Ph.D., Dan seems to have settled for a bachelors degree, so Melbourne worked better for me than Harvard did for him.