ote:
ing about
h as you
ADY!"
be on
ch is OVER
times as
ich is
e to
ate of
d the
tncome
300,000times
ch in
ith.
.for future capability.
he
the
t the
fery
Other major oil companies don't share Exxon-Mobil's delusion about the non-existence of anthropogenic global warming, and contribute at least as much in the way of energy and chemicals. By your reasoning you would be more likely to share their professed views rather than the demented lies whose propagation Exxon-Mobil subsidises at second hand.
I think you'd better think that out again.
I don't do nothing, but I don't do much. As I've posted here, the most my personal efforts could manage would be to delay the more catastrophic effects of anthropogenic global warming by a few milliseconds, and I'm nowhere near quixotic enough to inconvenience myself for that kind of negligible reward.
So Exxon-Mobil is a totally admirable firm? If this were the case they'd be ethical enough to say that they didn't want to believe in anthropogenic global warming on their own account, rather subsidising front organisations to do it for them.
You'd better think that one out again, too.
A number of non-thinking Americans distinctly embarrassed about their mindless gullibility.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen