Baloney. Only the first may have been a dud.
Why are you asking me? You're the one claiming to know the details of what capability NK has.
Information is readily available, just look and learn. Thanks for spottin g the capitalization typo nit, it's about all that you have right.
South Korean Government's initial yield estimate is 100 kt,[27] and it dete cted a 5.7 magnitude earthquake.[33] NORSAR Seismology Center initial estimate is 120 kt,[28] based on a magnitu de 5.8 tremor. On 12 Sept 2017, this was revised to an estimate of 250 kt b ased on a magnitude 6.1 instead.[4] The German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources estimate is "a few hundred kt",[29] based on a 6.1 detected tremor. The Japan Meteo rological Agency also detected a 6.1 magnitude tremor.[34] from USGS: "[Magnitude] 6.3 Explosion ... Possible explosion, located near the site where North Korea has detonated nuclear explosions in the past. If this event was an explosion, the USGS National Earthquake Information Cent er cannot determine its type, whether nuclear or any other possible type." Depth and lat/lon location approximate. The China Earthquake Administration also detected a 6.3 magnitude earthquak e.[35] The University of Science and Technology of China[36] estimated the yield a
The Geophysical Service of the Russian Academy of Sciences registered a 6.4 magnitude earthquake.[37] The Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory estimated 250 kilotons.[30] Japanese Government: 160 kt.[2] U.S. Intelligence/Air Force Technical Applications Center: 70 to 280 kiloto ns.[2