No more high voltage PNP transistors?

Dec 08, 2015 22 Replies

Should I ever randomly come into a scientific glassblowing and vacuum kit... I've always wanted to make one.

It should be, as mentioned, painfully slow (while electron tubes have practical speeds -- transit times in the single digit nanoseconds -- ions will be *microseconds*!), and proportionally low in transconductance and perveance. Still, a few tens or hundreds of micromho (that's microsiemens for you youngsters) should be possible, at perhaps a mA or so, and 100V (plus a heater and 10-100V for the ion generator).

Keeping the drift region adequately pumped will also be a challenge. Likely, it will inevitably exhibit a hysteretic or thyratron characteristic at higher voltages/currents.

So, if you thought lateral PNP stank...

Tim

Seven Transistor Labs, LLC Electrical Engineering Consultation and Contract Design Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com

You laugh, but storage rings find positrons more easily contained and cooled than electrons. Yes, vacuum tubes with antimatter are a real, useful, thing. Usually go by 'synchrotron'.

Dirac originally envisaged positrons as "holes" in an electron sea.

It's difficult to imagine that they are anything but exactly equally as easy to contain and cool as electrons.

Colliding particles and anti-particles does have it's advantages. Equal mass and equal and opposite momentum. The fragments don't have any inherited momentum.

Bill Sloman, Sydney

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required