The newer stuff from Altera doesn't seem to need sequencing. From the Arria II GX docs:
This section lists the functional operation limits for AC and DC parameters for Arria II GX and GZ devices. All supplies are required to monotonically reach their full-rail values without plateaus within tRAMP.
tRAMP = 4ms for "Fast POR" and 100ms for "normal POR".
Version 4 SymbolType CELL LINE Normal 48 48 48 96 LINE Normal 16 80 48 80 LINE Normal 40 48 48 48 LINE Normal 16 48 40 44 LINE Normal 16 48 40 52 LINE Normal 40 44 40 52 LINE Normal 16 8 16 24 LINE Normal 16 40 16 56 LINE Normal 16 72 16 88 LINE Normal 0 80 8 80 LINE Normal 8 16 8 80 LINE Normal 48 16 16 16 LINE Normal 48 0 48 16 WINDOW 0 56 32 Left 0 WINDOW 3 56 72 Left 0 SYMATTR Value NMOS SYMATTR Prefix XM PIN 48 0 NONE 0 PINATTR PinName D PINATTR SpiceOrder 1 PIN 0 80 NONE 0 PINATTR PinName G PINATTR SpiceOrder 2 PIN 48 96 NONE 0 PINATTR PinName S PINATTR SpiceOrder 3
--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence
over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."
(Richard Feynman)
Assuming nothing blows up during sequencing, isn't it better just to use a power supply supervisory scheme? Wait for the Kosher moment, then reset everything to a known state.
When you design the error amp in a chip, it is usually one stage, simply to have less poles. So my phrasing wasn't the greatest. Gain is OK, but phase shift is bad. Since the load is reactive, you have plenty of phase shift to worry about due to load interaction, so you don't need the amp itself to contribute phase shift.
Gain gets you voltage accuracy, but you really don't need microvolt accuracy on a power supply. Rather you want things well behaved.
I've done voltage regulation internal to chips that aren't all that well regulated, generally over temp, but have great supply rejection. Making a part work well with crappy bypass wins customers.
I've always had problems driving a mosfet directly or indirectly via a gate R with an op-amp+feed back. It seems that most common op-amps suited, just do not have the output drive required to get the fet into position quick enough due to gate C which ends up with a short burst of relaxation type of oscillation. Some times it just oscillates indefinitely.
if you put a (D) derivative circuit in the feed back it seems to avoid the oscillation but then, slows down response time. If that is ok then I guess there is no issues.
What I did, just because I needed a way of getting a low ohmic path that I could maintain with fast response, I put a complemary pair of followers on the output of the op-amp I was using, as a gate driver to over come the gate C..
It seem to work even though I wouldn't recommend it as a common practice. The charge on the gate actually helped to cover up the cross over distortion.
I think it is because of the \n escape sequence embedded therein. I had the same problem. This happens when the model is contained in the schematic rather than included from a file and the text is pasted into a text editor. I think.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.