Now you're trying too hard. That would be the pot calling the kettle black, at the very least.
Now you're trying too hard. That would be the pot calling the kettle black, at the very least.
I keep running into people complaining about the cold weather. In Central Florida. :(
Only those who fail to adapt
Those damn 'uncivil engineers' are at it again? ;-)
I also know some mechanical engineers who are remarkably lifelike, at times.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
The the poor, the old and the homeless (some overlap there), according to the news.
rming in 15 years
reezing over:
n/a/2012/02/03/intern...
reported in the
nobody good.
ough January. =A0The
've hardly had a
ying that they
not, because
hip.
d time, though. :(
nd overall warm
gardening, but
t mean
d at an
planetary
tends to
onal tornado
ncomfortable
like to
ectronics,
ore than
of
to
functions
e.
s?" is?
at that
it.
ffering
ulsive
fYou'd lose. Few people need the level of flattery you seem to require in social interactions.
I don't tell you that you are stupid, but that you are ignorant. The intelligent response on your part would be to get educated, rather than irritated, so your responses are are what tell us that you aren't as bright as you seem to think you are.
As far as helpful and informative responses go try out my response in "3D printing using electron beam melting" today. The crack about a mouse/elephant comparison was intended to be funny - and it certainly dramatises the difference between an electron beam welder with millamps of beam current at the target and an electron beam microfabricator with a few microamps at the source.
Of course it was childish and idiotic, as was your "repulsive people" crack. It at least had the virtue of being idiotic enough that it obviously couldn't be serious.
Thinking about it is mostly a waste of time. You don't often get opportunities to make life-changing decisions, and mostly there isn't any real choice. Am I going to act like a selfish swine? Or a responsible grown-up? doesn't need a lot of reflection (I opt for responsible grown-up every bloody time - childhood training sticks).
Badly. Why do you think I'm unhappy about not getting work? It isn't as if I need the money.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
lack, at the very least.
Dream on.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Bwahahahaha ha! So do I ;-) ...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at
warming in 15 years
freezing over:
reported in the
nobody good.
January. The
hardly had a
that they
not, because
time, though. :(
overall warm
gardening, but
mean
an
planetary
tends to
tornado
uncomfortable
like to
electronics,
than
functions
is?
that
offering
repulsive
If you're anything like as fatheaded in real life as you are here, nobody sane would hire you.
te:
warming in 15 years
f freezing over:
22C reported in theows nobody good.
through January. =A0The
we've hardly had a
saying that they
or not, because
rdship.
bad time, though. :(
, and overall warm
and gardening, but
inst mean
ated at an
of planetary
are tends to
asional tornado
d uncomfortable
u'd like to
electronics,
t more than
ge of
es to
ing functions
time.
ives?" is?
that that
do it.
ed.
s offering
repulsive
r of
.But quite a few people did, so at least one of your premises has been falsified. Your opinions about what sane people might do are reliably bizarre, so maybe you don't know what "sane" really means. "Sane people agree with John Larkin" isn't going to be a practical working definition.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
But only on payday! :)
news.
Still, some do absolutely nothing to prepare for cold weather when having an extra blanket, or even making sure the doors and windows are closed tight. An extra layer of clothes and being careful not to overheat or get wet can do wonders for your survival.
I have been though the US Army cold weather survival training, and spent a winter out in -40 for a good part of a year.
offering
repulsive
Look in a mirror, John. Vanity is thy name. I often find it trying to distinguish between you and Bill. =20 But then your company makes real products for sale to anybody, Bill makes NOTHING and won't even do easy experiments.
?-/
Hey Bomber, learn how to get your news client wanna-be (google groupers) to quote a little of the previous post so that normal news readers can figure out what you are replying to. Usenet is not a blog. A common mistake of web-weenies writing web clients for Usenet (notably including both Yahoo and Google).
?-)
Only when I have to.
Then why are you advising me to stare at myself in mirrors?
I often find it trying to
That's because you aren't interested in electronics.
Sorry. Very slack. Thought only Bill was paying any attention.
ering
sive
to
I certainly haven't made anything recently, but the experiment that I still haven't yet got around to doing isn't all that easy.
Measuring harmonic content that I hope to be something like 80dB to
90dB below the fundamental is a bit demanding - the aim is to compete with Jim William's Wien Bridge oscillators (as described in his AN-34)I'll have to block the fundamental with tunable notch - probably the bridge differentiator circuit mined from "The Art of Electronics" - and the circuit is going to contain a phased lock loop (to track the oscillation frequency) and a lot of dividers to drive both the demodulators to track the fundamental and demodulator that sampes the various harmonics. It's all routine stuff, but there's going to be quite a lot of it.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
fering
lsive
That's John Larkin's mantra - he's good at electronics, and he thinks that nobody else takes it a seriously as he does. The fact that he doesn't pay serious attention to anything outside of electronics (excepting perhaps his public image) doesn't actually justify his fond belief that he design and sells "insanely good" electronics, but you can see why he likes to think so.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
You certainly aren't. I've also told you that you need to quote at least the part of the previous post to which you were replying, and here you've responded to josephkk's post berating you for this fault without including any of his content.
If your plan is to present yourself as brain-damaged, you've succeeded all too well.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required