Re: Why Are There No Right Angle Traces?

> >"R. Steve Walz" wrote: > >> > >> BM wrote: > >> > > >> > I was told the other day that there are no right angle traces on PCBs

(the

>> > traces go to something like 45 degrees between perpendicular traces)

because

>> > of something to do with something or other. Could something please

explain

>> > this or point me to some resources so I can book up. > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > > >> > -BM > >> ------------ > >> Because the electrons slide off the copper if they take the corners > >> too fast! ;-> No, it's because chemical etching rounds off sharp > >> corners quite destructively, as it presents more side of the trace > >> to the etchant per lineal than a rounded one does. > > > > > >Nearly right! The ones on the outside of any corner have to travel > >faster than the ones on the inside. If the corner is 45 degrees or less > >this is OK, since the outside ones don't have to travel faster than C > >unless the track is wider than 100mils. But the transition is so sharp > >on a right angle corner that the outside ones have to break the C > >barrier on any track wider than 6 mils. The problem is that this is no > >longer legal, having been banned by Albert E. Thus the outside electrons > >are forced to crowd the inner lanes. Since they have already been > >accelerated more than the inner electrons they carry more inertia, and > >it's actually the inside electrons that get bumped. They then scramble > >around to the other side of the track and try to jump back on, hence the > >illusion that they have slipped from the outer edge. > > > >Al > > Not quite ;-) But current crowding does occur in corners. There was > a paper by Jim Dunkley on this subject, rigorously deriving the > current density in corners, clear back in the mid 1960's. > > ...Jim Thompson

Indeed, that is to be expected. The electrons are charged, so they repel their neighbours. They can only change direction or move if there is an inbalence in forces, so they will tend to bunch up at the corner and push adjacent electrons around it. There is therefore an increased density of electrons at the corner, and a high electric field as a result. Notwithstanding this the direction is being changed as they turn 90 degrees which is an acceleration, and accelerating electrons radiate. Anyway, that's how I look at it!

Mark.

Reply to
markp
Loading thread data ...

I have done layout on a lot of boards. To me, looks really do count, both on placement and routing. No self-respecting layout person would create an ugly board. They don't call it "artwork" for nothing. Also, having unnecessary vias is just plain wrong. Even though it really doesn't matter most times, I spend times to make the board look like it was purposefully designed. If it looks "pooped out" it probably was.

I remember once the boss was going to lay out a board himself. It was all in 90deg traces. Ugly as hell, and didn't work - not because of traces, but because of other errors.

Blake

Reply to
Blake Leverett

Have you done the measurements or the calculations? If not, your "feelings" are rather unimportant.

Let me ask, how fast do electrons travel? What is their kinetic energy? Is this important? If so, when?

--
  Keith
Reply to
Keith R. Williams

I'll buy that. Let's call it marketing one's self. How much money is put into packaging breakfast cereal?

--
  Keith
Reply to
Keith R. Williams

More than the cost of the food put in the multicolor pasteboard box.

--


Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

As Albert Einstein already said that only a beautifully looking formula can be a correct formula (I don't remember the exact phrase), only a beautifully looking piece of hardware will function flawlessly.

Of course, we all know that this is not necessarily true. I don't know whether there are some statistics available, but I think there is at least some truth inside.

Apart from all the technical issues involved (i.e. in this case by right angle turns), a designer that does not put any attention on the appearance of his design, does probably also not put much attention on the general design as well. As a result, it will show up some flaws. Therefore we might have some coincidence here.

I think this does not only apply to electronics.

Regards, Mario

---------------------------------------------------------------------- Digital Force / Mario Trams snipped-for-privacy@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de snipped-for-privacy@wooden-technology.de Chemnitz University of Technology

formatting link
Dept. of Computer Science Tel.: (+49) 371 531 1660 Chair of Computer Architecture Fax.: (+49) 371 531 1818

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply to
Mario Trams

Er..Ahmmm.. this is not a good one either. It appears that this particular "confirmation" is not really supportable. There errors of the measurement were not low enough. Of course, the bending of light has been confirmed with much better precision nowadays.

Kevin Aylward snipped-for-privacy@anasoft.co.uk

formatting link
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture, Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

Reply to
Kevin Aylward

It is better than you think. The anomolous perihelion advance is known to +-0.45 arcseconds per century and is 45.11 arcseconds per century. The GR value is 43.03 arcseconds per century. The remaining error may be either a need for a more accurate theory or errors in the less well known numbers in the GR calculation. The measured number must be considered accurate to at least the stated error band.

The precision of astrometric measurements is so high that these are the best confirmations of the theory aside from radar measurements.

Chuck

--
                        ... The times have been, 
                     That, when the brains were out, 
                          the man would die. ...         Macbeth 
               Chuck Simmons          chrlsim@webaccess.net
Reply to
Chuck Simmons

Wow, you have been studying!

Score: Three-letter words = 4 Four-letter words = 1 (impressive and original) Five letter words = 1 (most impressive)

Average word length = 3.5 (First-grade level, perhaps)

--
  Keith
Reply to
Keith R. Williams

I was referring to the bending of light, not the proof of the absence of the planet Vulcan. imo, a rational examination of Eddington's experiment is that it meant nothing.

Kevin Aylward snipped-for-privacy@anasoft.co.uk

formatting link
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture, Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

Reply to
Kevin Aylward

Copper IC metallization is already operating in the MA/cm^2 range. The whole nanotech/buckyball/nanotube thing is massively overhyped. Somebody is claiming a nanotube-based RAM...

formatting link

which just about pins my bogometer needle.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

I take it you're not likely going to be investing in the inevitable IPO..

"Mr. Schmergel won't say exactly how Nantero's chips will work, but he says they will use an electromechanical approach to storing memory instead of electrical charges."

formatting link

Founding Team:

Greg Schmergel Co-founder, President & CEO. Greg Schmergel was most recently Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy for About, Inc., the 5th largest Web property. Previously he was President and CEO of ExpertCentral.com, Inc.

formatting link

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it's the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

I happen to know some of the VCs who are funding this, and have seen the sort of corporate paperwork they like. I assure you that nobody (not the employees with options, not the angel investors, likely not the founders) but the VCs will get anything but screwed.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

Yes. The effect to be measured was close to 1 arcsecond and the probable error was about 0.25 arcsecond. It was a start. Much of the error was due to having to leave the camera in position for some months in order to get several night time plates of the same stars. The focal length of the camera changed slightly due to temperature change from the time of the eclipse to the time when the night plates were taken. Today, the optical experiment can be done to milliarcseconds without an eclipse and without waiting for months to get baseline stellar positions. The radar experiments are even better.

Chuck

--
                        ... The times have been, 
                     That, when the brains were out, 
                          the man would die. ...         Macbeth 
               Chuck Simmons          chrlsim@webaccess.net
Reply to
Chuck Simmons

On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 14:27:26 -0500, Jackson Harvey Gave us:

EFAD sounds better than ESAD as well.

Reply to
DarkMatter

Bigger words? Did you buy a Thesaurus?

You continue to impress me dimmie!

--
  Keith
Reply to
Keith R. Williams

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 22:54:15 -0400, Keith R. Williams Gave us:

Yer a Ditz. You don't get impressed, you get awed by every little thing.

Reply to
DarkMatter

Consume Feces and decease, wussy shaveling.

Average word length: 6.

:-)

Reply to
Carl D. Smith

Expire through coprolitic mastication.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it's the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

John Larkin:

There's also the fact that a diagonal line is shorter than two orthogonal ones, and a "diagonal bent" bus will occupy less PCB space.

Reply to
F. Bertolazzi

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.