I agree, but the whole discussion has been about my trying to convince you that many aspects used today by employers are not, in fact, particularly relevant at all and that this hurts the country's competitiveness.
Many people said the same thing about abolitionists and those advocating desegregation...
Nah, it's a slippery slope argument... one might you're thinking you might not want to hire those with credit problems, the next you're deciding you might just not want to hire some black guy either...
No, it most certainly is *not*. One is something you are (thus no choice)and the other is something you do (choice). The whole point is to filter people who make good choices vs. those who don't. Only an asshole (and racist) would equate the two.
Well, I'll give you that clearly you have zero choice as to your skin color or gender, as a practical matter a significant number of people end up with, e.g., lousy credit viz-a-viz largely unforeseeable events: No one expects to get divorced when they get married, no one expects to require 5- or 6-digit dollar amount medical care when they're still generally young and healthy, no one expects their own businesses to fail when they start one, etc.
OK, I think we've reached a good conclusion for our discussion here -- I agree that poor credit can be reasonably described as a lifestyle choice for some, and while I wouldn't think that was a factor in the "vast majority" of the casess, I don't have any good evidence for trying to suggest that it's 10% vs.
50% vs. 90% or whatever either.
An awful lot of one's politics hinges on just how many people in bad situations you presume got there via knowingly engaging in risky behavior vs. being due to forces largely beyond their control, I suppose; I think it's clear that you tend to lean towards thinking more of them got there via the "risky behavior" route than I do.
Agreed, although hopefully you'd also agree that it's a lot harder for someone making near-minimum wage to ever get *out* of that rut once they're in it that people making decent salaries like you and I are.
Indeed, I think we'd also both agree that part of the problem with welfare today is that of those who are willing to work, if all they can find is a near-minimum wage job without many benefits, they end up doing worse overall due to the loss of various entitlements than if they just sat back and watched Oprah all day... although I expect our proposed solutions to that problem would differ. :-)
One solution is to make it more difficult to live without producing. If you need assistance, work goes with it. There are many streets that need cleaning and much trash to pick up. Start with 12 hours a day and if they still can't find a job, fourteen. ...and then get serious.
Self-control isn't just a binary thing that you either have or don't have, however -- it takes a lot more self-control to get yourself out of poverty than it does to stay out of poverty, IMO. (In other words -- while it certainly wouldn't work in all cases, I believe that if you took welfare recipients and just plopped them down in a job as, say, an autoworker making $40k+ a year, a very large percentage of them would have no problems keeping that job and thus living a good, middle-class lifestyle. Perhaps I'm naive...)
I might say start at 8 and then go to 10, but generally speaking I think it's an idea with merit.
Who watches over the young kids for single-parents while they're out working, though? -- Government-provided day care being run by other welfare recipients? :-)
I assume so but I don't know for sure, because I chose to leave. Taxes used to be really high over there and that automatically comes with a ding to the standard of living. Some costs are still outrageous over there, for example taxes on cars. But then again, having lots of luxury isn't really what life is all about, at least not for me.
Germany and the US are probably on par, maybe a little better in the US because prices for the same goods are lower, but then health care is the pits.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.