high voltage LDO

Den mandag den 26. september 2016 kl. 22.45.50 UTC+2 skrev Jim Thompson:

Humongous can get you in trouble :P

formatting link

Reply to
Lasse Langwadt Christensen
Loading thread data ...

Adding 100mOhm does wonders to the phase margin...

...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    | 
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142    Skype: skypeanalog |             | 
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  | 
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
Reply to
Jim Thompson

There you go.

--
 Thanks, 
    - Win
Reply to
Winfield Hill

My point would be that a dual transistor is a single low-cost sot-23 package, just like a single transistor. Well-behaved at a low price. I originally suggested an op-amp, a low-cost sot-23, of course, for the same reason. A transistor or an op-amp, nearly the same impact. The dual transistor is a well behaved approach.

--
 Thanks, 
    - Win
Reply to
Winfield Hill

Are they really dual transistors or two dice in a single package? A few years back, I needed a dual but the only thing I could find that wasn't big bux was a Zetex part, and of course Diodes dropped it when they took it over.

Reply to
krw

Most of the pats in the AoE-III, Table 8.1b, page 502, are two separate transistors in one package. That's true of both the DMMT3906 and the BCM857DS. However, they're closely- adjacent die parts, with nearly identical characteristics. I'm not sure how much we lost when the monolithic parts disappeared.

For example, the DMMT3906 has 1mV Vos matching and 2% hfe matching. D-K has over 100k in stock at 11 cents/qty 1k and it's an active Diodes, Inc., part.

NXP's BCM857 has 2mV Vos matching and 10% hfe matching. It's low-cost and vibrantly-active.

--
 Thanks, 
    - Win
Reply to
Winfield Hill

What about the thermal characteristics?

Reply to
krw

Horrible. Hardly better than two separate packages, apart from the approximate die matching. The late lamented MAT02 and LM394 interdigitated sections to zero out gradients.

For a new laser noise canceller design, I've been looking at the possibility of servoing V_CE to equalize the dissipation in the two halves of the main differential pair. Some time back JL pointed out that Early voltage would make this not work with the transistors I was using. However, SiGe:C bipolars such as the BFP650 have gigantic Early voltages that make this worth a try, I think.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

I forget what the power dissipation was here, but it wasn't a lot.

formatting link

These sorts of dual transistors make horrible mirrors if the power dissipations aren't matched.

--

John Larkin         Highland Technology, Inc 
picosecond timing   precision measurement  

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com 
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Reply to
John Larkin

On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 at 5:38:40 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote: ...

jpg

...

There's enough headroom in that design before the PFET conducts to put a re sistor in the emitter of each of the current mirror transistors to improve the balance and reduce temperature effects - you could probably even use se parate transistors without a problem. Or replace one with a diode or just a base resistor to the positive supply.

kevin

Reply to
kevin93

Cascode configurations cure all that. ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    | 
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142    Skype: skypeanalog |             | 
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  | 
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
Reply to
Jim Thompson

Not horrible, just not as good as the grand old interdigitated pair of parts on a die. There's pretty good thermal conduction between the two parts on the die.

It's usually easy to insure both parts have nearly identical thermal dissipation. Get this concomitant benefit automatically by designing for nearly identical Vce voltages, to eliminate Early effect voltage offsets. For example, use a Wilson mirror instead of a simple Widlar mirror for high-voltage outputs.

Or come close in the case of circuit's like Jim's HV LDO, where one BJT has Vbe, the other has Vgs.

--
 Thanks, 
    - Win
Reply to
Winfield Hill

If you look at the datasheet for the BCV62C SOT23 current mirror, they say that the limit for stability of an undegenerated current mirror is typically 5 mA @ 5V, i.e. the output device runs away at a dissipation of 25 mW.

The tempco of collector current vs differential temperature is about

8%/K, so if the device runs away at 25 mW, an 8% increase must be enough to give a 1 degree differential temperature change.

That means that the thermal resistance between devices can't be better than

d(delta T) / dP = 1 K /(0.08 * 0.025 W ) = 500 K/W.

This is considerably worse than theta_JA for an ordinary SOT32, which is usually around 300 K/W.

You can sometimes keep the dissipation the same, but not if you want accurate differential pair performance over a reasonable range of splitting ratios. That's what the MAT0x parts were good at.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

A little bit of emitter ballast R plus a cascode arrangement can make even discrete elements well-behaved. ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    | 
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142    Skype: skypeanalog |             | 
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  | 
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
Reply to
Jim Thompson

For sufficiently small values of "well-behaved", at least compared with a MAT02 or LM394. Those tricks only work if the two sides are running at similar currents. Maximum-power biasing has the same limitation.

And degenerating a current mirror slows it down dramatically. (The switcheroo Wilson mirror actually contains 3 local feedback loops, which is why this happens.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

I seem to make mirrors that run nicely at 100's of MHz >:-}

And the Wilson mirror is hardly optimal... besides he's a cretin second only to Solomon ;-) ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson                                 |    mens     | 
| Analog Innovations                               |     et      | 
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    | 
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142    Skype: skypeanalog |             | 
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  | 
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
Reply to
Jim Thompson

Sure, me too. Now do it with SOT-23s running at 1 uA. ;)

The switcheroo Wilson is a pretty nice circuit. That's the one with 4 transistors, with the diode-connected ones in opposite corners. Cancels out the beta dependence, and the aforementioned three local feedback loops--two diode-connected BJTs and the overall feedback.

Doesn't work for s**t with non-monolithic devices, though.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs 
Principal Consultant 
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC 
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics 

160 North State Road #203 
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 

hobbs at electrooptical dot net 
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

... 500 K/W.

Be an optimist, it means it can't be worse than 500K/W !

It also means a 4- transistor variant (cascode current mirror) would work out well, the power hog won't thermally couple excessively to the sensitive pair. Alas, there's no off-the-shelf package of four transistors that really works well for the thermal coupling of the sensitive pair and also decouples the others.

Reply to
whit3rd

Use a matched pair for the sensitive ones, and something else for the other two. Cascode transistors don't have special requirements.

--
 Thanks, 
    - Win
Reply to
Winfield Hill

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.