It was more impressive back in 2000 -01 when dollars went up 800% for the same power from the same generators.
formatting link
"Drought and delays in approval of new power plants[4] decreased supply and forced up wholesale prices, which increased over 800% from April 2000 to December 2000."
-Bill
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
D
dagmargoodboat
I
That was thanks to the "deregulation" law, the one that specified who could make power, who could sell it, when, and where they could buy it, and how much they could sell it for.
Back to the earlier subject, banks will prosper if we let the economy recover, and you can find a bank that's sound. I can't tell--the public documents they file just don't tell you what you need to know. I tried figuring out Citi's mortgage exposure in '08, and it simply wasn't disclosed. What they did publish was false on its face.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
D
dagmargoodboat
o
o
". Instead
boss.
FDR started the SS employer contribution. It's a deliberate way to disguise how much tax you're paying--out of sight, out of mind.
I'm like you--I want to see the bill, the whole bill, and don't hide it. If you think we need to do something Mr. Politician, fine, make your case and tell us the cost. No dishonesty, please.
Putting your money in a local bank might do some good (if not for you, for someone else). In one of these big, insolvent, mortgage-bubble behemoths? No, probably not.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
R
Rich Grise
It's worse than that - it's Statism vs. Liberty.
Thanks, Rich
B
Bill Bowden
.
e I
It's all speculation James. BAC went down about 4% in the last 3 days, so who knows where it will go from here. It's all a gamble, and bonds are taking a big hit while Cds are paying less than 1 percent, so there's no place to hide. Maybe we have to go outside the US to find anything reasonable. I've always liked US investments, but I'm thinking other countries might be the way to go from here. This is the worst market I have seen. Worse than than the tech bubble of the late
90s. And Jerry Brown (governor elect) a true progressive has just suggested massive 25% across the board cuts to help out with California's 23 billion deficit. I like Jerry, even if he is a liberal, he knows what he has to do.
-Bill
D
dagmargoodboat
Well, if you're a speculator, yes. I'm just not willing to make a big bet on a company I don't understand, in a questionable business, with, frankly, books full of lies.
That's because interest rates are going to go up.
I didn't like the sound bite where he said politicians _have to_ lie, but three cheers for Jerry if he cuts spending 25%. Maybe there's hope for California yet.
The federal government needs to do some of that. Instead they're spending more, another quarter-trillion or so in the lame-duck. If you want to know what's holding back the economy, look no further.
-- Cheers, James Arthur
B
Bill Bowden
Yes, but the bond buyers have to estimate higher rates in order to set today's prices. Who is to say if the buyer or the seller is right? Both the buyer and seller have to decide if it's worth staying out of the market to wait for higher yields while losing current yields. Same thing with stocks, who can say if the buyer or seller is right amongst millions of trades? I tend to subscribe to the efficient-market idea that says all current information is already factored into the price, and doing research is a waste of time.
formatting link
-Bill
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.