Fluorescent Fixtures

more, less

more or less

Another failure of perception on your part ...

Krw is even dumber than Dan, as he reminds us remarkably frequently.

Once krw has stored an observation in his write-only memory, there's no way of correcting any initial misapprehension he might have made, and he misapprehends a lot.

Or another failure on your part to recognize sarcasm.

Dan

You'd like to think that you were being sacastic, but you really don't achieve anything that could be described as "bitterly cutting or caustic". Yet another failure of perception on your part.

If you had ever actually been to Harvard, you would probably have been exposed to people who could manage real sarcasm, and might have developed a proper grasp of what the word means.

So you are saying you can not recognize sarcasm unless it is " bitterly cutting or caustic ".

Dan

Have some fun in life. Get one of these. :D

Michael

Back some 50+ years ago when driving on Arizona's remote highways was a bit of an adventure I helped a friend install aircraft landing lights on his '64 Mustang... light up the world for a couple of miles ;-) ...Jim Thompson

I don't even like a step stool anymore. I have enough trouble, just walking with a cane. :(

Shame about the comment at the end relating to the electricity bill. The writer should have checked that, instead of making assumptions.

Sylvia.

$4/hr, assuming $0.20/kw-hr, right?

Who knows, maybe the author enjoyed having a bonfire in his room for a few hours or days :)

(how did he get the house wiring to provide 100+ amps of current?!)

Of course it was just a closing crack. What's that $4 an hour (more like a buck-and-a-half in places where leftists don't rule).

achieve anything that could be described as "bitterly cutting or caustic". Yet another failure of perception on your part.

exposed to people who could manage real sarcasm, and might have developed a proper grasp of what the word means.

cutting or caustic ".

No. I'm saying that you might have been aiming at sarcasm, but didn't come anywhere close.

What you posted was mere abuse, and of a rather low quality at that. That y ou can imagine that it might be characterised as "sarcasm" is pure wishful thinking on your part. You do seem to be inclined to quite a lot of wishful thinking. The claim to have gone to Harvard (as student) seems to fit in w ith that.

Jamie is a good deal less than coherent at the best of times - and - judging from the kind of nonsense he espouses, no expert judge of coherence in the first place.

te:

are incorrect, but - unlike you - what I do post is more or less coherent.

Krw doesn't understand coherence. Either an opinion is one that he shares - and thus it is correct and coherent, no matter how asinine - or it's one t hat he doesn't share, in which the person who posted the opinion is wrong, and has to know that they are wrong, and is thus lying.

This avoids all that tricky fact-checking and those pesky tests for interna l consistency. It would work better if krw knew a bit more about the world.

The claim to have gone to Harvard (as student) seems to fit in with that.

It fits right in there with your claim of having a Phd.

Dan

You made sure not to overload the poor little magneto? :)

Hell a Phd aint ntohing, around here you can rent those for as long as you need it!

Jamie