Nice. Take no prisoners over-the-top everywhere.
Nice. Take no prisoners over-the-top everywhere.
I don't understand the drawing. Where does the Q9 BF862 JFET's source current go?
-- Thanks, - Win
This is a version they sent me to check--Q6 is the tail current source for Q9, but it's drawn upside down. (My output is paper schematics plus BOMs, so their layout guy did the schematic capture.)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com
I had to change K1 to a 9-V coil part, because it didn't pull in reliably with a 12 V coil. Otherwise it worked fine. I still have one someplace.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com
Normally a TIA's output voltage is relative to the summing-junction return, FGND in this case, but here it's relative to FGND - Vgs of the JFET, where Vgs is a poorly-defined value. But you added a 2nd BF862 to match, trying to bias to Vgs=0 (for Idss = 10 to 25mA). Was this a design where you only needed to know relative output changes?
-- Thanks, - Win
2nd
FGND is "floating ground". The probe tip has to have a bias voltage (AC and /or DC), and the simplest approach was to float the whole front end.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.