One switch inverter - experience?

Do somebody have experience with this one switch inverter?:

Here is a one switch inverter - but besides the one switch, it also has two parallel coupled reverse-blocking-switches closer to the output, that functions as active rectification - see the schematic at page 2:

A Synchronous Single Switch Inverter - Purdue School of:

formatting link
Quote: "... Four modes of operation were detected in creation of negative and positive polarity voltages. ... Not only did the bench test work, it lead to the discovery of several other circuits and controllers for high-power inverters with lower switching loss, higher voltage performance and lighter reconfigured circuits.

Therefore, as the number of high frequency switching devices is decreased, the efficiency is increased. For instance, a 90% efficient [H-bridge] converter becomes 97.2% efficient. ... CONCLUSION A new power inverter circuit was introduced that required only one high frequency switching transistor. The inverter used a synchronizing structure to change the voltage polarity on demand. Therefore, real time generation of infinite voltage levels was realized. The state space equations demonstrated a forth order system. ..."

The inverter could be used for solar micro-inverters:

formatting link

The inverter could also be used for:

  • brushless motor
  • step motor

The circuit is a "all-in-one". It could be used for (T1 and T2 refer to the iupui.edu article):

  • Positive DC, DV. T1 is used for active rectification. T2 is not used.

  • Negative DC, DV. T2 is used for active rectification. T1 is not used.

  • Any curve shape can be amplified with a signal from a suitable signal generator. (retangular, saw tooth, triangular...) T1 is used for positive curve parts - and T2 is used for negative curve parts.

Could it be used for a Class D audio amplifier with the right control circuit? Low enough distortion?

The circuit bear resemblance with a reversed SEPIC:

formatting link

-

Indiana University. (2012, October 17). New class of power inverter could mean cheaper, faster hybrid vehicles. ScienceDaily:

formatting link
Citat: "... Izadian's invention, the result of a creative reconfiguration of an electrical circuit during a laboratory experiment, would make inverters cheaper, lighter and therefore more efficient than current models. ... For example, unwanted harmonics are greatly reduced with Izadian's invention. ..."

-

Additional reading:

formatting link
formatting link

Active rectification (synchronous rectification):

formatting link

Glenn

Reply to
Glenn
Loading thread data ...

I'm sure there's a comment about liberals in there, somewhere...

Curious what Mr. (Dr.?) Aizadian thinks T1/T2 should be implemented with, if not "high speed switching transistors".

Tim

-- Seven Transistor Labs Electrical Engineering Consultation Website:

formatting link

Reply to
Tim Williams

Not me but *infinite* voltage sure sounds useful!

I cannot take that paper seriously, fig 3 seems to show current in a

0.1uH inductor taking 20milli-secs to get to 75A.

piglet

Reply to
piglet

Hi,

The high speed switch Q is probably PWM'ed to do that. It looks like an interesting topology, if it is a new one that is cool, maybe will replace SEPIC?

cheers, Jamie

Reply to
Jamie M

Are those two inverse parallel transistors IGBTs? I have never used an IGBT but datasheets for them that I have seen show a body diode like a power mosfet. That would make the circuit as drawn useless as one or other of the two body diodes would always be in circuit.

I wonder whether the papers author meant to have a diode in series with each collector/drain and so then the IGBTs would only be switched at the low rate of output polarity changeover. That would tie in with his statement of one high speed switch. Or did he mean to have the two IGBTs series-opposed back to back i.e. emitter to emitter? Anyway that paper is not clearly written.

piglet

Reply to
piglet

They must be but besides the one switch, it also has two parallel coupled e.g. Reverse Blocking IGBT (RB-IGBT). (Or two serially connected Power MOSFETs. The Power MOSFETs must be connected so that their substrate diodes have opposite directions):

formatting link

Application Characteristics of an Experimental RB-IGBT (Reverse Blocking IGBT) Module:

formatting link

A High Efficiency Indirect Matrix Converter Utilizing RB-IGBTs:

formatting link

Reply to
Glenn

They must be reverse blocking switches e.g. Reverse Blocking IGBT (RB-IGBT). (Or two serially connected Power MOSFETs. The Power MOSFETs must be connected so that their substrate diodes have opposite directions):

formatting link

Application Characteristics of an Experimental RB-IGBT (Reverse Blocking IGBT) Module:

formatting link

A High Efficiency Indirect Matrix Converter Utilizing RB-IGBTs:

formatting link

Glenn

Reply to
Glenn

On 16/10/14 23.45, Tim Williams wrote: ...

I think you have a very good point there.

But it might be that he meant that it was one non active rectification switch.

A half bridge uses two non active rectification switches.

A full bridge uses four non active rectification switches.

Glenn

Reply to
Glenn

Please note that he writes "infinite voltage level" in the abstract.

-

He made some graph axis blunder...

v=L*dI/dt

(0.000375 V) = (0.1E-6 H) * (75 A)/(0.02 sec)

So the axis label may be 10^-5 seconds?

Glenn

Reply to
Glenn

Please note that he writes "infinite voltage levels" in the abstract.

-

He made some graph axis blunder...

v=L*dI/dt

(0.000375 V) = (0.1E-6 H) * (75 A)/(0.02 sec)

So the axis label may be 10-5 seconds?

Glenn

Reply to
Glenn

Definition:

formatting link
Quote: "...

  • Active switch: Switch state is controlled exclusively by a third terminal (control terminal).

  • Passive switch: Switch state is controlled by the applied current and/or voltage at terminals 1 and 2. ... Single-quadrant switch: on-state i(t) and off-state v(t) are unipolar. [e.g. diode-like, reverse blocking] ..."

Better name: One active switch inverter.

The two active rectification switches are passive switches.

-

A half bridge uses two active switches.

A full bridge uses four active switches.

Glenn

Reply to
Glenn

Fine, but you'll have a hard time explaining how a back-to-back "passive switch" (diode) will be of benefit...

If the intent was to say that, "oh, well, you just need to tell it to be one or the other...", well pray tell, how do I convey that to the diode? Surely not with a third terminal? ;-)

Tim

--
Seven Transistor Labs 
Electrical Engineering Consultation 
Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com
Reply to
Tim Williams

You can indeed do that... if the diode's thermionic. I scratched my head over the cct diags in that paper too.

NT

Reply to
meow2222

I wonder what one could call such a beast? How about Silicon Controlled Rectifier :>

piglet

Reply to
piglet

:-)

Reply to
Glenn

Hi Tim

Sort of...

Design:

T1 serially connected to T2.

T1 is N-MOSFET with drain "up" (drain connected to L2 and C1).

T2 is N-MOSFET with drain "down" (drain connected to zero/commen).

T1 and T2 sources connected together.

-

Active rectification:

When positive output is needed T2 is on. T1 do active rectification.

When negative output is needed T1 is on. T2 do active rectification.

Glenn

Reply to
Glenn

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.