A terrible link - sorry for that.
Thanks,
> Rich
A terrible link - sorry for that.
Thanks,
> Rich
Firefox is not impressed.
Mark L. Fergerson
Mozilla Firefox did ok. Took about 3 clicks. Chrome Unstable killed it in 1 click.
This is why i rarely click on a posted link until someone else has commented on it. Most are a waste of time, a few are interesting, and then there is the rare trap.
Or just turn off all scripting in your browser... Much easier.
I don't get it. What's a "welcome forever" link? Whatever it is, it didn't do anything to xlinks2
It's a snippet of javascript that triggers on "on exit", and reloads the page. (or the spam.)
Cheers! Rich
commented=20
is=20
I would like to. But two sites i really want require java to work right. What i really need is much more fine grained control, off generally and on for specific sites.
The same issue with cookies.
You can do that in Firefox 3.5
commented
Firefox 3+ with an add-on called NoScript. Allows you to decide which scripts run and which don't.
And FlashBlock replaces flash objects with a blank box and button (to allow you to run it if you desire).
The Firefox anti-scripting plugin allows site-by-site enabling of scripts. Just the ticket for those few that you need to allow 'em on. That's what I'm using, and it works very well...
commented=20
there is=20
I might try it if i thought it was properly stable. Good old MSWin age software, if it is mostly running ship it.
commented
Firefox is not related to MS. It is tested a long time prior to actual release. They also fix issues very quickly. The biggest problem are web sites which don't use proper coding. OR ones who are simply lazy...
commented=20
there is=20
I read in a lot of places, and i hear at least 10 times the complaints about the 3.5 series than i hear about the 3.0 series. I will let it mature a bit more. KDE4 is not quite ready yet either.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required