I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin wrote (in ) about 'Court authorized wiretaps in the U.S. surged last year', on Tue, 3 May 2005:
Of course not, and you know that very well. We DO have *effective* measures for combating and even curing some cancers. Ineffective measures are subject to restrictions on advertising and marketing.
Consumption might not, but much social harm would. Addicts wouldn't be forced to rob people to get money for hits.
Yes. That is exactly what should be done. Just like for alcohol (except the lawsuit option; people are indeed expected to know that over-indulging in alcohol is damaging) and tobacco