It seems to be working just fine even at half power. The resulting black hole seems to be consuming funds quite efficiently.
-- Paul Hovnanian mailto: snipped-for-privacy@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------ ~{po ~poz~ppo\anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
On a sunny day (Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:47:53 -0800 (PST)) it happened Bill Sloman wrote in :
Poor Billy, Exxon Mobil is *against* global warming as I tried to explain to your last remaining neuron, because if it is cold they sell more fuel and the fuel price goes up.
Another of those 'fabulous' Sloman designs?
Someone who is blind and deaf could pick him out, just by the overpowering scent of a LOSER. :(
,
fraud.
As in one more fable invented by John Fields and enthusiastically believed in by Mike Terrell. The usual case of the dumb fantasist misleading the even dumber brown- nose
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
man
t remaining neuron,
Since the explanation - as I pointed out at the time - failed to take into account the the fuel they sell to run air-conditioning units (like the ones my wife and I have in our cars, even if your bicycle doesn't feature this kind of luxury) it was just one more example of your failure to understand what was actually going on, and now alos reflects your incapacity to get your head around any new fact that hasn't been organised into a seductive package by your friendlu=3Dy loca denialist web-site.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
kim
Michael Terrell - being a well-known winner, and widely touted as the most successful member of his high-school graduating class - wouldn't know what a loser smelled like, would he?
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
It did a great job of sucking up what little was left of Bill's brains.
It has even generated a scientific paper or two, which is what it was designed to do.
Jan Panteltje's little kopftje isn't really up to understanding scientific papers - and John Fields hasn't shown any sign of appreciating them either - so they do have a problem in seeing the point of building the thing in the first place.
-- Bil Sloman, Nijmegen
kkim
It is a dam poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word.
fraud.
Hell, if I wanted to invent a _real_ fable it'd be that you knew what you were talking about.
But no one would believe it, so what'd be the point?
JF
Some of us with vision know what the depth of the term "Entropy" extends to. That big hot spot under Yellowstone isn't just idle... it has moved. That means that its cycle is due, as are the cycles of many other geologic / chrono-cyclic events.
Every now and then the world just jiggles a little bit.
Our just happens to coincide with more than a few predictions or "prophecies".
You know not the hour...
We do so often seem to appear as being one of God's great, noble experiments... that failed.
Jesus certainly said so. People need to start examining things from that baseline. None of us are anything other than equal, and the biggest problem is that there are those that continue to strive to sink below the mesh that is considered normalcy, and at the same time, there are those that get exalted into authority, yet abuse the office and accuse those that are normal of being "below the mesh". They magically float above it, never being held responsible for their actions. I speak, of course, about the abomination that our police have become. They are nothing short of Nazi pigs now, with their profiling behavior. The really sad thing is that visual profiling techniques do NOT work.
They are no longer crime fighters, but now nothing more than opportunists that "find" criminals during their illicit, constitution circumnavigating, illegal search and seizure maneuvers. With all the idiot rookies out there, being trained by already totally retarded instructors and "superior officers" that the country will never recover. I saw this coming as a child, when I saw the TV news of the Chicago riots. I knew then, that this country was doomed to become a police state. It only looks free.
They are gearing up, folks.
Keep your powder dry.
Why do you call this a disaster ? It's the normal scientific process. You have a theory that something cool will happen when you try X, so you make an experiment. If what you expected does not happen then you know that your theory was wrong, that is, you gained some new knowledge - it's no disaster !
Whether (or better: when) a new more powerful machine will be built is a political decision.
Sorry, it is an American colloquialism. I did not anticipate that the "over there" crowd would get it... or need to.
Once you do, however... it should all be clear.
Exactly. "Hey we blew a few billion on this machine and discovered nothing. So now we want another few billion to build another machine that may discover nothing". I think it would be the end of the line for Big$ physics.
And what powder do you refer too?
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required