You are apparently the one here who thinks you know so much about the COMMUNICATIONS spec from being a mere WIRE BOY for a few years.
The SPEC uses it. Period. Get a clue. Been that way (the twist pith differences) since CAT5 and CAT6 follows the practice.
The pairs, in fact, all four have a different twist pitches and if your machine does not fine resolve the twist pitch, then it is a piece of shit machine.
formatting link
They are all four different, and by 'general' appearance they look like two pairs at one pitch and two at another.
They are close to that, but are actually all slightly different in a fully conformal manufacturing process.
I have seen vendor data sheets which declare it and have tables for it even, while offering older spec wire all twisted the same as well.
If you hook up the old stuff (or likely your shit), you will not get a full 100 base T handshake, much less anything faster. Even my new std cable modem blinks a different color on the front panel indicators if I use a shit cable to link to it.
We used shrouded connectors at work and shielded CAT6 wire and insure that the twists remain right up to the connector header and crimp the drain into the shroud. The receptacle has to be shrouded CAT6 as well and the internal cable on the other (back)side of that bulkhead as well, if that is what it is plugged into.
I make clean, high speed EYE. AND I know why.
You make fuzzy, spur laden EYE. Because you don't even know what one has to do to RETAIN CAT6 compliance throughout a circuit path. The ENTIRE path.
You don't even have part of the clue. The ENTIRE clue.
But you probably know how to make the wire twisting machine twist wire.
You just likely have no clue how accurate the twisting has to be. That is based on your pathetic responses.
Blahhhhhh , Blahhhh, Noise , Noise. All Random. You can't even decide if it's white, or pink today..
Why don't you go back home, your mother forgot to dress you. You forgot to take off the lipstick and dress you were fantasizing in last night.
Look up Brand-Rex+Bcc-Brand-Rex- BCC-General and General Cable.
If you look hard enough, you may even find a picture of me sitting in one of the groupies..
Go play with your crap products. We actually make products that work better than others. There is a reason for that. But you wouldn't know it if it was staring at you.
Maybe you should come and visit us, I'll introduce you to one of our irradiation units set on 3Mev and make sure you get a good look at the scan horn.
Yes, it does. The twist differences are required by TIA-568. It is also done with Cat3. Moreover, the twist of each pair is varied over the length of the cable.
Usability for any given purpose is a different question.
Apparently so. The CAT6A-U/FTP (individually shielded pairs) has much less skew. I assume they don't vary the twists on that version.
That might just work!
The spec is 45 ns per 100m, and we're measuring almost that on CAT6A-F/UTP, so the equivalent delta-length is 30 feet or so. Awful when skew matters.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
600 Pairs is a lot. Years ago when telephone wire was in we used to make the wire that drops down in the ocean with very many pairs. If there was a defect on that cable, it was repaired in house.
We'd find it with a fault analyzer and open the jacket. Fish down in there with surgical tools and repair it.
Yeah, it's a LOT nicer when there's a standard for the connector. SCSI, for example: I started making a list of those connectors, and there were only ... eighteen. That was before SAS, of course.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.