We had been talking about mainboards. Obviously even the CPUs themselves had more than that.
We weren't talking about a big world, we already had a context for the topic, or do we really have to backtrack and restate every little thing in a topic without it being in context? If so, where exactly does that end?
100 layers, idiot. Since the late seventies. You said "two" since '85. I was making home-hobby PCBs at home that were two layers in '85. So you're a total loon.
What really IS a question is how you think that anyone is taking you seriously after that... at all. Hahahaha!
Guess-as-you-go doesn't work here.
In article , snipped-for-privacy@spam.com says...>
We were talking about PCBs. Define "CPU" (we clearly weren't talking about chips).
When you admit that you leaped *way* beyond your knowledge.
And yet, after 3,001 trolls, you continue to feed it, bypassing my troll filter?
Go away.
If it bothers you that much, I *permit* you to stop reading... though this topic is like beating a dead horse so you'll get your wish either way.
You're an idiot, Grise. A worthless dope, at best.
As a technician i was working on 4 and 6 layer boards by 1973. Flat packs everywhere. A few had as many as 80 leads. Daisy and Mentor were booming new businesses.
To say the least. Both Award and Phoenix bioses were modular by the late 1970s. I used Phoenix in a knock off product back then.
No surprise. It seems Kony is the only one who thinks multilayer boards are the latest fad. We had our own design system. I didn't use any third party design software until '99. In college (before '74) the "design system" was tape on paper.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.