We had been talking about mainboards. Obviously even the CPUs themselves had more than that.
We weren't talking about a big world, we already had a context for the topic, or do we really have to backtrack and restate every little thing in a topic without it being in context? If so, where exactly does that end?
100 layers, idiot. Since the late seventies. You said "two" since '85. I was making home-hobby PCBs at home that were two layers in '85. So you're a total loon.
What really IS a question is how you think that anyone is taking you seriously after that... at all. Hahahaha!
Guess-as-you-go doesn't work here.
In article , snipped-for-privacy@spam.com says...>
We were talking about PCBs. Define "CPU" (we clearly weren't talking about chips).
When you admit that you leaped *way* beyond your knowledge.
And yet, after 3,001 trolls, you continue to feed it, bypassing my troll filter?
Go away.
If it bothers you that much, I *permit* you to stop reading... though this topic is like beating a dead horse so you'll get your wish either way.
You're an idiot, Grise. A worthless dope, at best.
As a technician i was working on 4 and 6 layer boards by 1973. Flat packs everywhere. A few had as many as 80 leads. Daisy and Mentor were booming new businesses.
To say the least. Both Award and Phoenix bioses were modular by the late 1970s. I used Phoenix in a knock off product back then.
No surprise. It seems Kony is the only one who thinks multilayer boards are the latest fad. We had our own design system. I didn't use any third party design software until '99. In college (before '74) the "design system" was tape on paper.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required