Did you *read* the article? From this article, "doctors are wary of encouraging anyone to start drinking alcohol". Everything in this article says, "may" or "might" or "seems" or "appears". The best line though is the point that, "Most research on resveratrol has been done on animals". Why is it that no one wants to believe research done on animals when the results are bad, but they are happy to believe the slimmest of evidence that says something that is otherwise very bad for humans, may have a slight benefit?
I'm not going to respond with insults. Just read the article critically. No authority is claiming that the net effects of any alcohol are good for you.
Of course, you believe what you want. I was shocked to find out how she died.
And yet you offer no support for your views. Oh, and more from your "proof"... "More research is needed before it's known whether resveratrol was the cause for the reduced risk."