9V 1A schematic needed

I read in sci.electronics.design that Roger Lascelles wrote (in ) about '9V 1A schematic needed', on Sun, 20 Mar 2005:

By all means. I've been doing this mains harmonics stuff for 14 years, so a few days won't make a difference.

--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. 
There are two sides to every question, except 
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

[snip]

That seems to work in the states.

I wrote checks on my account, exactly down to zero while paying bills, thinking nothing of it.

Went to the bank to make a deposit and was told the account automatically closed.

They reinstated the account, but I've very careful to avoid hitting exactly zero again.

...Jim Thompson

--
|  James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
|  Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
|  Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
|  Phoenix, Arizona            Voice:(480)460-2350  |             |
|  E-mail Address at Website     Fax:(480)460-2142  |  Brass Rat  |
|       http://www.analog-innovations.com           |    1962     |
             
I love to cook with wine.      Sometimes I even put it in the food.

Thanks.

That's a fine way to approach it. The concept you just outlined of some components grouped together for simpler analysis is known as a "cutset".

....

Actually, as you state this, (and I also suggested), we are both a bit incorrect, hypertechnically. The average value and the RMS value of a signal taken over a fixed period are independent except for the constraint |Savg| What am I missing?

Your newsfeed appears to be little slow. There have been several posts on this over the last hour or so.

--
--Larry Brasfield
email: donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com
Above views may belong only to me.

[More on this later.]

I thought, since he is doing an analysis that I went to some trouble awhile back to complete and put into moderately clear form, that Mac might be interested enough to do a simple Google news search. It appears that you are unfamilier with the power of that tool because I was able to find that thread in less than a minute using the obvious name and group search criteria plus body containing ("transformer" and "capacitor" and ("rectifier" or "bridge")). I had no need of any special knowledge to spec that search. Here is the link:

(watch for word wrap)

You might want to take a look at it. There are examples of both rational discourse and dealing with a spew emitting crackpot who has achieved some fame. There is even an example of "ass handed" if you like.

[Insulting speculation cut.] Just for your edification: I was not ready to go spend the same minute Mac could spend if he wanted without some reason to believe he was interested. It was a pure efficiency consideration, nothing as awful as you would like to believe and proclaim.

And John, before you elect to insinuate that I am a liar, would not common decency tempt you to attempt a search?

--
--Larry Brasfield
email: donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com
Above views may belong only to me.

It's a PITA, but what's worked for me in the past is to make sure that the last check drawn on the account takes it down to _precisely_ $0.00.

--
John Fields

I read in sci.electronics.design that Active8 wrote (in ) about '9V

1A schematic needed', on Sun, 20 Mar 2005:

I don't know what happens in USA, but you could get the same aggro in UK if you wrote a cheque instead of instructing the bank to 'close the account and transfer the funds to ...'. That way, the account is erased from the computer, so it can't send you daft messages (probably).

--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. 
There are two sides to every question, except 
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

Once again- you are a good-for-nothing Nazi liar, a pathetic little poser who couldn't even understand opamp 101, came on the NG lying about breadboarding something when in fact all you had done was run a half assed simulation on a SPICE freebie. You are a good-for-nothing p.o.s. and I can't think of single person who wants you posting here, plonk-and-run girlie man.

You're just a little pussy girlie type playing "guess what I'm holding behind my back"- this is so typical of you low mentality types who otherwise would be a server in a cafeteria somewhere. Can you handle a

16 character alphabet? Aren't you so cerebral. Like I said before, you are in a low end niche market, get it while you can, your skill set is limited, and you will soon become obsolete.

PS I wasted no time at all working on your puzzle, pussy boy. Ha Ha Ha ....

You're just a little pussy girlie type playing "guess what I'm holding behind my back"- this is so typical of you low mentality types who otherwise would be a server in a cafeteria somewhere. Can you handle a

16 character alphabet? Aren't you so cerebral. Like I said before, you are in a low end niche market, get it while you can, your skill set is limited, and you will soon become obsolete.

PS I wasted no time at all working on your puzzle, pussy boy. Ha Ha Ha ....

I read in sci.electronics.design that Active8 wrote (in ) about '9V 1A schematic needed', on Sun, 20 Mar 2005:

Our banks are utterly mad, but that surpasses! You close the account, and later someone tries to present a cheque, they should 'refer to drawer'.

Well, yes, so do I, but that's for my own accountant's benefit.

--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. 
There are two sides to every question, except 
'What is a Moebius strip?'
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk

If I first substitute your 'Im' and 'Irms' with 'Savg' and 'Srms', I get: Srms^2= + Savg^2 where < >... A brief application of algebra and notation unnoting yields: Savg^2 = Srms^2 - Now, square each side of my stated constraint to get: Savg^2

--- So, instead of referring the OP to a particular post or thread containing the salient information, (if, indeed, such a post or thread exists) you would have him wallow in your offal. To what end? Why, in order to force him to read the ***GREAT*** Larry Brasfield, of course and, in the process, expose him to the ***UNIVERSAL TRUTHS*** revealed by diligent study of the subtleties to be found in that offal.

-- John Fields

Fred, you're running out of ammo, scroll down here and get some more

;)

LOL- the 7905 guy...

--
OK, but my point was that here, IME, (and, apparently,in JT's) it's
not necessary to _ask_ to close the account, merely drawing it down to
precisely $0.00 will _automatically_ close it.

I don't waste time playing games with these smart-mouthed trolls like Larry Brasfield. In order to keep the response time to 100ms or less, I first scan the post for any technical content whatsoever by looking for words like noise, gain, level etc...this takes no time because there are none. Failing this preliminary test, I snip the whole mass of worthless gibberish and paste in the main response which succinctly states he should get to the technical gist of the thread or just shut up and go away. I refuse to waste any time decoding any type of subjective and off topic idiocy coming from that deranged nobody- he sticks to the technical topic or gets slapped-period.

--- Decency has nothing to do with it, and since I'm not interested in this particular subject, reading what you have to say about it holds no interest for me. OTOH, the motivation behind your "style" does, and I will continue to comment on that as I see fit.

-- John Fields

algebraically related.

But Fred, they are related by a number that can have any positive value. This means that the 2 quantities I mentioned in the constraint have no a priori relationship other than that they must adhere to the constraint. I never claimed that those numbers were independent of the actual signal, since, as you and I both know, they are related as you have shown.

one independent variable that defines Irms through

You may recall that I introduced this little subject thusly: Actually, as you state this, (and I also suggested), we are both a bit incorrect, hypertechnically. The average value and the RMS value of a signal taken over a fixed period are independent except for the constraint |Savg|

More of your slander, PLONK-AND-RUN PUSSY?