Non-efficient = fire hazard?
Aren't CFLs supposed to be greater fire risks than incandescents?
What about a 15-watt 120V incandescent - typically about 3.5% efficient at producing usual definition of visible light?
What about the F4T5 cool white fluorescent - about 8-9% efficient at producing visible light, about 12% efficient at producing radiation, and about 88% efficient at producing non-radiant heat?
How about 1977-1982 type green LEDs, cheap gallium phosphide green, still available at Digi-Key, with efficiency generally less than 1/4 of
1%? Has any of the billions of these not being abused ever caused a fire anywhere in our solar system?How about I plug a 2.2 megohm 2-watt resistor into my living room outlet - zero percent efficiency at producing anything I want now? Perhaps negative, now that it's air conditioning season in the Philadelphia metro area? How is that going to start a fire? How can even mice and bugs that visit my apartment get a fire going from that?
As for efficiency at producing 5 kV at 40 uA, I think a voltage multiplier, perhaps Cockroft-Walton, after a 120 or 240 VAC line or a wallwart-powered inverter, outdoes anything using a microwave oven transformer. My junkbox microwave oven transformer, at 119 volts AC at 60 Hz with no load at all, draws 71 watts and 744 volt-amps according to my Kill-A-Watt meter. It does heat up quite a bit - 71 watts dissipated in a transformer that small sounds to me like a candidate for a fan if operated continuously for more than half an hour, maybe as much as an hour.