I realise the odds aren't great but worth a try.
As I've mentioned in other threads I've been 'refurbishing' a 'Playmaster Pro Series Three' kitset power amplifier. I have a photocpy of the instructions that came with the (DSE) kitset (basically a copy of the article in Feb 1994 EA). Also I found on the net where someone had uploaded scans of the original article and grabbed that. However there are a few... inconsistancies between the text and the diagrams / photographs. I know from reading a few EA magazines and a few Silicon Chip magazines that there are often postscripts to construction projects in magazines in the following months, either in the Notes and Errata sections or as sidebars or even in the 'Postbag' section/s.
Just a thought what with this group being aus.electronics and usenet being mostly the domain of older people. I've heard mixed reviews of this amplifier with some saying they sound great and others saying they sound average. I even read a comment by one guy who'd heard several of them and said one sounded amazing, some were average and one was nasty and that it probably comes down to construction techniques. (The one I'm fixing up was certainly under the 'bad construction technique' category.)
So with those varying comments I'm wondering if there might also have been post-kit improvements discussed in the next two or three months that could also account for the wide variations in how people think that they completed amplifiers sound.
Just a thought and maybe worth a shot asking while I still have it mostly in bits.
Cheers,