OT: carbon dioxide reduction question

**Duh.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Typical response from you. :(

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

**Nope. Just a succinct one. Here, OTOH, is a typical response from me (after an idiotic post from you): **I don't need to prove it. It has been well documented:

This is an interesting primer on the topic:

-- Trevor Wilson

You can find websites that say whatever you want, 'Chicken Little'. None of their so called science is proven, just like your claims.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

You can't expect much more from it.

**I note you have STILL failed to answer any of my questions, nor have you commented on anythng I said in any substantive way. Your idea of a cogent argument is to refuse to respond to questions and points of logic and resort to pitiful sniping.

You are a failure.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

Considering how little demonstrable formal education tweva had his response is not surprising , when queried about education the reply was studiously avoided offering a fair indication of having nothing to back the claims bar fallacious innuendo and blurred badly modelled results based on poor information and guesses designed to support a result rather than obtaining a truthful result and hence by omission maintain the funding model and income .

--
X-No-Archive: Yes

I don't expect anything from people who refuse to look at the sources of the material they quote.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

u

ort

Nothing that could be said to you would break you out of your cult.

In what way ?

I would say that my life has been pretty good to me regarding my career, marriage family, friends, health etc. I worked hard for everything I have and have not had to accept handouts, or "sheltered" jobs, "jobs for the boys" etc.

To me that is not failure and if it is failure in your opinion, so be it.

As long as you keep quoting, paid off/vested interest "sources" as fact, I'm not going to..

**Nothing YOU can say will suggest that the science is wrong. You are far too stupid to be able to mount a credible argument. You have failed, thus far, to do so. **You're not very bright. You continue to snipe, rather than presenting a rational, reasonable argument. Look at how Mr Liebermann conducts himself. You're nothing like that. You are a failure. **A failure in the sense that you think you are smarter than you really are.

--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

He is an audiophool salesman / module replacement tech? Some education.

?-/

He's also an anti-gun nutball.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

rot.

e

ation.

I forgot about that one. He is into victim disarmament, and with it - discrimination.

The further you dig, the worse it gets.

No need to dig. It's obvious.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

Lets use helium instead then we could sound like Mickey Mouse - should be a major hit with the kids.

Also, reading his posts on the CFL thread, he's a religious bigot.

Jerry

Yep, sure can.

Duh, rooly? No need to get bent out of shape.

There must be, if European breweries (who were brewing the stuff long before your lot) produce excess CO2 and have resorted to making carbonated soft drinks (er, that's "pop" to you) among other methods of using the EXCESS.

There are different brewing methods.

--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.