Identify these parts?

May 27, 2008 10 Replies

Hi,



I have 2 parts in a SMPS that I think are PTC thermistors. One is marked KC103P, the other KC221K, the first a blue disk looking just like this:

formatting link



The second actually looks more like a huge blue tantalum cap, smaller than the first but fatter, not a disc.


If you Google these, you come up with all those companies that can sell you



1000 at a time, but I can't find any data to tell me what they are or an equivalent.



Any help appreciated.,


thanks,


Gareth.


"Gareth Magennis" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@bt.com:

formatting link

metal oxide varistor. MOV

formatting link

Acts like a short circuit to voltage spikes.

bz please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an infinite set. bz+spr@ch100-5.chem.lsu.edu remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap

Makes sense now of course. Thanks.

Gareth.

On Tue, 27 May 2008 11:12:51 +0100, "Gareth Magennis" put finger to keyboard and composed:

This site ...

formatting link

... suggests that the KC103P is manufactured by Murata Electronics North America.

This site ...

formatting link

... lists the KC103M as a capacitor made by "S/M".

I suspect the part may be a high voltage 10nF ceramic cap.

It would help to know to which other parts these devices connect.

- Franc Zabkar

Please remove one \'i\' from my address when replying by email.

I think what your looking at is a MOV..

The PTC thermistors are from Keystone Carbon Corp., I used these some years ago. Not sure they are in business anymore, but the line may have been picked up by one of the components manufacturers.

I did find this :

formatting link

But that might be new-old stock.

Jon

** That pic looks exactly like a regular NTC thermistor.

Mains voltage rated PTCs are used in the AC supply to PSUs, both transformer and switchmode to provide anti-surge PLUS overload protection.

Impressive to see one doing its job, running stinking hot while allowing only 25mA or so into the faulty PSU.

.... Phil

OOPs, that is indeed what I was thinking of, was NTC, not PTC, for inrush surge limiting.

Jon

You replied to a 17 year old message.

I've seen replies to older messages, but in this case, it's only been 7 years. 17 would have the original post in 1998.

And in this case, I seem to have missed the original post, so yes, it's amusing to see the other replies, which clearly came because of the first post.

It's often interesting to look at the original thread, because these old post resurrectors often don't. They think they have something to add, yet the original thread often covers the whole thing.

Michael

You're right. I had seen a 16 year old message replied to on another group a few minutes earlier, and wasn't paying close attention.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required