Until just recently, I was running a Xenix server that's been running since about 1993. I got tired of waiting for it to die, so I pulled the plug.
Thanks. 20% of the purchase price is not what I'm looking for. I'm curious about the repair cost percentage of the replacement price. $200 / $300 = 67% which is far too expensive. If you can find a $300 replacement laptop, I would certainly replace instead of repair.
However, if you're looking for a Windoze 8.1 machine, I don't believe you can buy anything decent (i.e. i3 CPU or better) for less than $400. If you want a screen that you can see, which means 1920x1080, I would guess about $500 minimum. Since laptops don't come with built in CD/DVD drives any more, add another $40. (Add about $150 for MS Office 2013 Home and Student). Ignoring MS Office, taxes, Geek Squad, time to reinstall, and some extras, my guess is a shiny new Win 8.1 laptop will set you back about $450 minimum. $200 / $450 = 44% So, what percentage of the REPLACEMENT cost would you be willing to repair the laptop rather than replace it?
$80 / $450 = 18% $100 / $450 = 22% $120 / $450 = 27% I usually use 25% as my fix/replace break point, which puts the jack replacement as marginal. I just wanted to confirm my pricing. The $75/hr shop rate allegedly includes any warranty and failure to fix costs. At 25%, I guess the decision should be by whether the laptop is worth fixing. If it's a single core CPU or older, forget it. If it's a dual core or later, then it might be a worthwhile repair.
Incidentally, for the laptop tightwads, the $130 laptop: I have several and they run Ubuntu 12.04LTS quite fast and fairly nicely.