Alternative DMMs to Fluke?

Apr 06, 2006 45 Replies

Ive had quite a few (cheap) multimeters in the past, then I got a second hand fluke 77 fairly cheap, its far beter than all the others ive had put together and its lasted ages. probably atualy works out cheaper in the long run (and the battery lasts ages too). I like flukes and this model in particular, it was the one to go for at the time at work especialy if you didnt have to pay the price tag, however im not sure what else is around that can match it in terms of being nice to use reliable and rugged.

Incedently I saw a project for a home made power supply on the web where the insides of a multimeter were used as the volt/current readout, some are so cheap they are actualy cheaper than a proper panel mounting digital meter.

Colin =^.^=

I have some Omega test equipment, it is pretty good. They are not as solid as a Fluke or a Tek, after all they are knock-offs.

temperature,

I am not familier with the Fluke version of the Omega HHM290. Could you point out the correct model number to me so I can buy the Fluke version next time.

Mastech. I have one and have also used other ones of Mastech, and I find them high quality products.

I don't read top-posted messages.

Greetings,

IMHO, the most important thing about a Fluke meter is not the quality of its build, but where it is built.

Sure, Flukes cost more, but there built in the USA (AFAIK). You're getting some of your money back in the taxes they pay (assuming you're an American, an Iraqi, or a North Korean (eventually)).

You may not like how much Fluke charges, but you can be reasonably sure that they're not going to use the extra cash to invade Taiwan or launch nuclear missiles at YOU.

Back to your question:

Although I don't think its made anymore, my favorite DMM was a Simpson

467. Very convenient for field/industrial use when "worn" with the high quality, real leather carrying case (which allowed the meter to dangle from your neck -- look out for door knobs!). It also had a swell set of features.

Although I do own a Fluke, I generally use a cheap, but well liked (non-ROC) VOM at work, and a Triplett 630-PLK at home. (I think I'm the last person that has ever bought one new, but, as they're still for sale, you can beat me if you wish:

formatting link
I've grow ever more fond of VOMs with age, and ever less fond of DMMs. Something about the way their digits keep staring at me whilst they drain, albeit slowly, their batteries disquiets me.

If your keen on investigating your meter choices, you might want to look around the eclectic collection offered (mostly exclusively) on line at Electronix Express/RSR Electronics

formatting link
Not only do they have what may be the worst FET-VOM ever built, but they also offer a Triplett Model 3250 DMM with a Head-up-display. (You wear a transparent monocle upon which your test results are displayed.) Anyone ever try it?

Cordially, Richard Kanarek

How is that different than a Mazda pickup truck or IBM Personal Computer, or any number of a thousand different every day items? Sheesh, indeed!

Keith

Not made from foreign parts. *Made* in China and Taiwan. BTW, IBM Personal Computers aren't even IBM. The brand was sold to Lenovo (for five years). Same for GE appliances and...

No, a Ford sticker. Mazda light trucks are made in Ford plants in the US. The 'B' series trucks are Ford Rangers. I suppose it would freak you out to know that Volvo and Jaguar are also Ford and Saab (the cars, anyway) are GM.

So you're as crooked as those you bitch about. BTW, the US has laws against such nonsense and I'm surprised the EU doesn't as well.

Re-branding is not fraud. You think Sears shouldn't be allowed to sell "Die-Hard" batteries or "Kenmore" appliances?

Keith

Keith Williams wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@News.Individual.NET:

One recent model of Saab has a Subaru drivetrain.

Perhaps the product should say on it who actually made it.

I recall when TEK was shipping customers 400 series scopes to a 3rd party cal lab,and that lab was putting TEKTRONIX cal stickers on the units they calibrated,and their software printed out a "Tektronix" cal certificate,but they did not disclose to the customers that a 3rd party lab was doing the cal,and intentionally giving them the false impression that TEK was doing the work.(by use of TEK stickers and fake TEK cal certs.)

IMO,that was dishonest.(and not the highly respected TEK of earlier times)

Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net

It's not, and that's the problem: When you have company A that simply slaps their name on company B's product, obtaining service & support for that product is typically much more difficult than if you simply bought the product from company B to begin with. Additionally, the purchase price from company A is often higher than going the direct route!

Wow, the test leads run right to your temples when you wear that thing! I'm not sure if it's for real or a Trek/Borg-inspired joke!

Tim.

If you bought company B's product, you go to company B for support. If that company is a fly-by-nighter, you shouldn't have bought it. Because it is the same widget as Company A's is meaningless. You didn't buy company A's, even if they're the same hunk-o-hardware. If company A's was cheaper, you're a fool for buying the same thing with company B's sticker on it. There is no fraud going on here at all. It's all aboveboard. The problem is not with re-badging but with your perception. TANSTAAFL.

Keith

This site is a bit hard to maneuver, but an interesting one, and I bought a Vellman portable oscilloscope last month for $125, the cheapest price I could find, and I also got a free Vellman DMM to boot..

Gee a Tripplet analog for $260. I have the old 630 right here.

greg

Hi Keith,

You're illustrating exactly the problem with Tektronix (and other companies such as IBM) here: They have a reputation for a certain level of quality & support, so you can't blame the customer when the company starts re-labeling someone else's product, sells them, and then can no longer provide their traditional level of service.

Sure, it's above board and not fradulent -- it's just disappointing. I don't think anyone here *is* claiming something truly evil is going on, just that it's sad to see traditionally excellent companies go down this path in a manner somewhat akin to "selling out."

---Joel

No, but I can just see someone using that in combination with the voice recognition software/hardware that Tektronix sells for their TDS series oscilloscopes

formatting link
! :-)

Let's go back! The OP's bitching because he bought a FLUKE, with Company B's label on top. He *DID NOT* buy a Fluke. The IBM deal is quite like the GE deal. They're selling their name as part of the unit sold. The name is worth money. ...and they're still servicing the products *THEY* sell. I suppose you don't think GoodYear should sell tires under the GoodYear name in Sears.

In the end, it's up to the consumer to know what he's buying.

Why? He bought a Company B product that is the same as a company A, but paid for Company B. Why is that disappointing?

You're wrong. He was claiming *FRAUD* (until I challenged this absurdity), which clearly it's not.

Keith

I agree. I've had Fluke 77s for fifteen years. The only reason I bought a bunch of $4 HarborFreights was that my Flukes had a habit of taking a walkabout. One hasn't been seen in 12 years. THe HF's can now go walk. BTW, I've only replaced the batteries in the 77s once in those fifteen years. They still work quite well.

Sure. At $3-4 each...

Keith

Thus spake Keith:

OP, here.

I have 73 and 77. Both work quite well, also. The only reason I'm looking for another meter is that neither of these are true RMS reading meters. Mfr of equipment I'm servicing is spec'ing pulsed DC voltage as an RMS value. I can't accurately measure this with these meters.

I've been quite happy with these meters, but I need true RMS measurement, and my eyes would appreciate larger display and a backlight. I've been eying the Fluke 87, but would like to at least see what *doesn't* measure up to the Fluke before I plunk down the $$.

Thanks,

DaveC me@privacy.net This is an invalid return address Please reply in the news group

Smitty Two wrote in news:prestwhich- snipped-for-privacy@news.west.cox.net:

I'd say that at least 51% of the content(labor and parts) must come from the country of "manufacture".

How is it set for the auto industry?

Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net

Honda takes a bit of tin, bashes it into shape, installs a Japanese engine with all made in Japan electronic components. A Japanese radio, Japanese brakes. and calls it " Made in North America"

"Spokesman" wrote in news:JvKdnZiVX9uqG6DZnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@wightman.ca:

I hate to break it to you,but Honda makes auto engines for US Hondas in their Marysvale,Ohio plant,they have been for a long time.

US Hondas have greater US content than many "Detroit" autos/SUVs,some of which are made wholly or partly in Mexico or Canada. Some of the Japanese US auto plants are shipping US made autos to Japan. IIRC,only the West Coast gets Japanese-made Honda autos.

Jim Yanik jyanik at kua.net

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required