DCM corner issue

Hi Does somebody know DCM corner issues? My DCM is not running at ver high clock rate (only 107MHz), so I don't think this issue i connected with XAPP685 application note

formatting link
This DCM is used with an DDR-SDRAM memory controller, and when I plac it at X3Y0 instead of X2Y0, memory reading often fails (data ar wrong). Thus the solution is not complicated, I just need not t use DCM X3Y0 but I would like to understand why it fails and i somebodyelse knows this problem. Thank you

Reply to
seb_tech_fr
Loading thread data ...

Cher Sebastien, What part are you using? Virtex4? Have you seen answer 21127? HTH, Syms.

Reply to
Symon
21127 would not cause what Sebastien is experiencing (on V4),

That concerns itself with a lower than 500 MHz possible CLKIN if the device has been baked at high Vdd AND high temperature (see the NBTI white paper).

In actual fact, we saw this effect in HTOL testing with the production tester, but have never seen it in actual fact either on the test bench, or in any testing done by any customers.

There is a suspicion that the testing done is far too tough, and the problem only appears on the production tester (which tests to >700 MHz, with a +/- 100 MHz sampling) in its tests to ensure that the DCM will operate over all corners of the process, voltage and temperatures).

For any device with a DCM:

More likely is that the placement of the DCM affects the timing of the paths that are used.

Check all the constraints, and check to see that the global clock resources are bring routed properly by looking at the design in FPGA Editor.

For V2 Pro there are clock macros which are used to minimize the possible skew from different DCM locations. If this is V2 Pro, then I could see this happening if the macros were not being used.

Austin

Sym> Cher Sebastien,

Reply to
Austin Lesea

Hi Austin I use an V2P70, which is loaded at 76% I don't use any macro for DCM. Which one should I use

Concerning placement and routing, all constraints have been met. It'

possible that this part is not constraint enough..

Additional information. When I use a lighter version of my desig

(which is loaded at 20%), it works.

21127 would not cause what Sebastien is experiencing (on V4)

production

bench,

will

the

Editor

I

wrote i

ver

Reply to
seb_tech_fr

formatting link

See page 2.

Aust> Hi Austin,

Reply to
Austin Lesea

Thank you Austin I have to try, but the application note depicts exactly my case

formatting link

It'

th

NBT

th

FPG

the

[/quote:2c5a58d0bc][/quote:2c5a58d0bc
Reply to
seb_tech_fr

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.