Dear colleagues,
The ByteBlaster works fine with MaxPlus 9.4 / Windows 95 but fails with MaxPlus 10.2 / Windows 98.
"Unrecognized device or socket is empty"
Any clue ?
Nordic regards, Yuri
- posted
20 years ago
ByteBlaster fails on Windows 98
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
I'm sure my home-made version of the Byte Blaster worked OK with Win98 SE. It works OK with WinME. Both with MaxPlus 10.2.
Leon
-- Leon Heller, G1HSM Email: aqzf13@dsl.pipex.com My low-cost Philips LPC210x ARM development system: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/lpc2104.html
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
Isn't this an error message for the MPU programmer? Are you sure you are configured to use a ByteBlaster? (in the Options/Hardware Setup menu)
Alan Nishioka snipped-for-privacy@accom.com
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
Dear friends,
Could your check and then post your BIOS LPT port settings for me ?
Thank you in advance, Yuri
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
I just dug out my home-made ByteBlaster clone and an old Flex10K10 board of mine and checked that they still worked with MaxPlus 10.2. Configuration with a simple test function worked OK. I'm using WinME with the port configured for EPP operation.
Leon
-- Leon Heller, G1HSM Email: aqzf13@dsl.pipex.com My low-cost Philips LPC210x ARM development system: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/lpc2104.html
- Vote on answer
- posted
20 years ago
Further to the above, I'm actually using an ISA EPP parallel port card for the ByteBlaster. The motherboard parallel port is connected to my printer. I use the EPP port for other devices like Xilinx and ARM JTAG interfaces.