is it possible to learn electronics through self study?

Hi,

Can anyone advice me regarding learning electronics through self study!

I'm a computer science graduate. I would like to learn electronics to play with robotics.

Any resources available in net for self study?

Thanks

Reply to
Prabu
Loading thread data ...

I personally believe it is possible to learn electronics through self study, but it is a lot harder to do so on one's own. I taught myself the fundamentals while in high school (where there was no electronics course at he time) and then went to a trade school to get the piece of paper that said I knew something, and found that having a good teacher gave me a much better "big picture" view of how it all worked together. For myself, would recommend Grob's Basic Electronics for the fundamentals, and Electronic Principles by Malvino for the more advanced topics (like transistor biasing, etc.) Post your questions, and someone will at least try to answer them for you. And the net is full of information, you just have to ask the right questions. Google is your friend there.

Dave

Reply to
Dave

Get a copy of "The Art of Electronics" and its companion "Student Manual for The Art of Electronics." Read the main text, work through the exercises in the student manual.

You'll need access to some parts and test equipment. You can use SPICE to simulate some things and as a pseudo test and measurement environment but you'll need to build some real circuits as well.

--
Rich Webb     Norfolk, VA
Reply to
Rich Webb

--- Google is also your friend WRT to USENET posting conventions.

From:

formatting link

"Summarize what you're following up.

When you click "Reply" under "show options" to follow up an existing article, Google Groups includes the full article in quotes, with the cursor at the top of the article. Tempting though it is to just start typing your message, please STOP and do two things first. Look at the quoted text and remove parts that are irrelevant. Then, go to the BOTTOM of the article and start typing there. Doing this makes it much easier for your readers to get through your post. They'll have a reminder of the relevant text before your comment, but won't have to re-read the entire article. And if your reply appears on a site before the original article does, they'll get the gist of what you're talking about."

In short, don't top post.

JF

Reply to
John Fields

formatting link

Try this url, let us know what you think. I don't remember who originally posted that link - but whoever it is should get the thanks.

Ed

Reply to
ehsjr

Apologies. Will try to remember, and not repeat.

Hope this is better...

Thanks.

Dave

Reply to
Dave

Prabu wrote in news:47cfc955-a685-4735-b642- snipped-for-privacy@u9g2000pre.googlegroups.com:

FWIW, that's what I've been trying to do.

In th eend, it mainyl depends upon one's aptitude. My strong aptitudes are mostly right-brain/conceptual-analytical/visual, whereas my weakest point has always been Math and related linear-logical subjects.

There are entire books on-line - I also bought a couple - "Practical Electronics for Inventors" is IMO great! I still needed to fill in a bit with other references, including my old Physics text from University (yup, I took 101 and 102 - but stank at it) but the latter was because PEfI was confusing re: Capacitors.

One of the most confusing thing is that different book use different symbols for some things - most common seems to be "E" versus "V" for Volts, but the more egregious IMO is C sometimes meaning "capacitance" and sometimes meaning "charge".

You also have to keep track, in the formulae, of those pesky prefixes, such as micro-, milli-, mega-, and so on.

I've been finding it useful to write up my own "book" or notes, collecting all the various formulae, because the books don't necessarily do a great job of relating one section with another and explaining how it all fits together.

OTOH, unilke me!, people with an aptitude for electronics can "see" in their heads how it all fits together. So if you are like that, self-teaching shouldn't be at all bad.

In case you're wondering, I'm teaching myself becuase i have one specific thing I want to do - I'm very "goal-oriented" in that I tend to learn what I need to so as to do something sepcific, make a specific item/project. THat probalby also makes it more difficult, because I don't have the patience to "start from the beginning and learn it all through". If you have a generalized interest in electronics itself, that, like natural aptitude for math-related topics, will also make it easier.

In the meantime, try the links below as a starting-point.

HTH!

- Kris

Best:

formatting link
Alternately, you can start here (the links seem to work better for me) D:\\ELECTRONICS_4_Solar\\Volume I - DC All About Circuits.htm
formatting link
(Wikipedia also has links and references that you can follow)

More decent links:

formatting link
formatting link
m
formatting link
formatting link
formatting link
formatting link
((you can DL a pdf called "What is a Capacitor?", and IIRC, some other stuff as well))

Videos:

formatting link
(a videotaped lecture - there are links to subsequent lectures in the YouTube "related vids" column to the lower right)
formatting link
More videotaped lectures - this time, from MIT
formatting link

Also, Google is your friend: Google the following:

"Navy Electricity and Electronics Training Series" - you can downloasd the PDF file

"Electricity and Magnetism" by Benjamin Crowell (another PDF)

Reply to
Kris Krieger

Kris Krieger wrote in news:Xns9BD787DDC75ACmeadowmuffin@216.168.3.70:

ERROR: in the lins at the end, where I said "Alternately...", I linked to the pages I'd saved, not to the online site! OOPS! But the first link works ;)

- Kris

Reply to
Kris Krieger

are

has

Sometimes you really do need to take a class. I was fine at C programming (self taught from books, after taking a Pascal class) but I just couldn't understand C++ from books. Then I took a class. An analogy: C is like walking into a jewelry store, taking what you like, and leaving the cash on the counter. C++ is like walking into a jewelry store, asking the clerk for a ring, the clerk takes the ring out of the locked case, then you pay for it. Slower, less efficient, but more security. Ah! Now I get it.

it

, I

ols

he

ning

I thought the convention for charge was "Q".

formatting link

ch

g

job

her.

So true. I did the exact same thing when studying for my licensing exam (not in electronics).

eir

t I

THat

to

or

Regards,

Michael

Reply to
mrdarrett

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.