(Beginner) Varistor or TVS

Hello again, Ant_Magma. Ay, there's the rub. Protection from the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune is the very essence of why the idea of data transmission over power lines has never really caught on.

You're supposed to be using a Bel coupler

with your INT5200 chipset. In the above data sheet, the manufacturer suggests you just put a MOV directly across the line. How quaint.

Look, Ant. First off, this is the reason why these things always come to grief. There's nothing in this that suggests the whole HomePlug/Powerline (hey, isn't that a blog? Hi, Rich -- I know what you're thinking ;-D ) Power Packet setup is going to be much more reliable than the X10 or other means to get data across the power lines. Apart from the indisputable fact that home line voltage wiring doesn't have controlled impedances or terminations, too many evil high voltage high power anomalies happen on the line to seriously consider it as a safe or reliable data transmission medium.

If I absolutely had to do this (and I wouldn't), I would try to find a non-inductive Aryton-Perry wirewound resistor of a good value to put in series with the line and the Bel coupler, but before the MOV (view in fixed font or M$ Notepad):

| R | (Non-Inductive) | _ ___ | .---o_/ \\o-------|___|--o-----------. | | FU1 | - | | |L1 .-. / '---. ,- | ----- | |/ )|( | | | MOV )|( |o G /| | .---' '- | -/ '-' | | ------ | | | |L2 | | | '-----------------------o-----------' | (created by AACircuit v1.28.5 beta 02/06/05

MOVs can be made to absorb a lot of energy (and are very economical compared with a TVS), but unless you have something to limit the current, you're depending on the MOV to absorb all. That's not very reasonable. And yes, MOVs are used up by powerline transients. By limiting the energy of the transient with a resistor, you're extending the life of the MOV, too.

A series non-inductive resistor would limit the energy being absorbed by the MOV in the event of a lightning strike or other voltage spike or surge. Wirewounds are made to handle enormous overloads for brief periods, and might be well-suited to this application. Also, if they fail, they're guaranteed to fail open, which is another advantage. If an MOV fails, it can go either open or usually short. If short, then it's explosive -- be sure to fuse this (and make sure you've got a non-inductive fuse, too).

You'll have to do some hunting, and try to find good non-inductives. Work with the manufacturer to keep total resistor inductance below 1uH. Try for a larger wattage resistor -- I'd be looking at 10 watts for better reliability.

All of this is really to say that the problems with this setup are very serious, and the fact that everybody (chipset manufacturers, consumer electronics manufacturers, Radio Shack, coupler manufacturer) is pushing the buzz and pretending this problem either doesn't exist or isn't that big a deal just indicates that it's not ready for prime time. Possibly just an intellectual exercise that's doable and very interesting in the lab with filtered constant voltage isolation transformer, but is mostly just being used to pump up stock prices.

The other part of this is that you're talking about playing with line voltage here. Back in the day, hobbyists came to grief trying to duplicate the then-emerging "next best thing", the X-10 standard for home appliance control. I'm not aware of anyone who was crisped, but I heard of a number of explosive failures, turning silicon into magma. Some of this came off an ill-considered DIY article in a hobbyist magazine in the mid-80s, with a schematic and layout that had a few rather sad errors.

The questions you've been asking over the past month kind of indicate this might be a little too much for your level of experience and technical knowledge. You might want to consider putting this one off and doing something a little simpler until your knowledge level comes up a little.

Good luck Chris

The varistor degradation means you next consult the numbers. Charts relate number of transients and size of those transients to life expectancy.

TVS diodes will not degrade BUT will also provide much less transient conduction. Both devices must include safety provision for that unacceptable and catastrophic failure.

Note conduction. Suppressor devices do not work by absorbing. They are shunt mode devices that make temporary electrical connections.

C> I'm building a power line modem.

Thx w_tom & chris.

Chris, thx4 ur concern but this is a project i have to do, if i want to graduate from university.

Maybe i'll post my coupl> Ant_Magma wrote:

Thx w_tom & chris.

Chris, thx4 ur concern but this is a project i have to do, if i want to graduate from university.

Maybe i'll post my coupl> Ant_Magma wrote:

Hi, Ant. Just out of curiosity, could you answer a few questions?

• What's your major?

• Frosh, Soph, Jr., Sr?

• Is this the senior project?

• When's it due?

Thanks Chris

Electronics major Senior year Yes Approximately 2 months time

John, pardon me. Thank you for your gentle reminder =)

Chris wrote: Hi, Ant. Just out of curiosity, could you answer a few questions?

• What's your major?

• Frosh, Soph, Jr., Sr?

• Is this the senior project?

• When's it due?

Thanks Chris

Ant_Magma wrote: Electronics major Senior year Yes Approximately 2 months time

John, pardon me. Thank you for your gentle reminder =)

Hi, Ant_Magma. You're out of time. You definitely need more help than you can get on s.e.b., in a timely manner, especially at this stage of the project. I'd suggest looking around for a graduate student or another senior who might be able to give you a dozen hours of concentrated time over the next couple of weeks, and help you get your project on track. This will, of course, be at standard tutoring rates. But if you're willing to pay, you should be able to get help.

I would guess it's too late to back out of your project. If it isn't, google s.e.d. for a number of good threads on worthwhile senior projects.

But if it is too late, and for one reason or another you can't withdraw from class or get an extension, get a hold of a small 240VAC : 120VAC isolation transformer (240VA) immediately, both for safety and also to help with line transients. Use any unregulated wall wart for your power supply, preferrably with a single 9VDC @ 1A or more output. Use an LM317 with 10uF caps on input and output side, and with 120 ohm and

Waste anything but time.

Good luck Chris

Thanks for you advice Chris. There were a few problems that had me started with this project too late which i won't elaborate further.

If i follow your method, won't i have 2 plug heads (don't know what's the proper term)? 1 plug brings in the signal to the transformer the other brings in the power supply from the wall wart?

I have already ordered Bel's powerline signal coupler, can i try and build it like the schematic drawn in the datasheet? The live and neutral wires are connected parallelly to the coupler and the PSU (step-down transformer). Since the coupler only passess the Homeplug frequency of 4Mhz-20Mhz filtering out the 50/60Hz power freqeuncy i should be safe right? For the step-down transformer i'm thinking of using any encapsulated PCB transformer available on Farnell.

Please advice.

Thanks for you advice Chris. There were a few problems that had me started with this project too late which i won't elaborate further.

If i follow your method, won't i have 2 plug heads (don't know what's the proper term)? 1 plug brings in the signal to the transformer then to the coupler and the other brings in the power supply from the wall wart?

I have already ordered Bel's powerline signal coupler, can i try and build it like the schematic drawn in the datasheet? The live and neutral wires are connected parallelly to the coupler and the PSU (step-down transformer). Since the coupler only passess the Homeplug frequency of 4Mhz-20Mhz filtering out the 50/60Hz power freqeuncy i should be safe right? For the step-down transformer i'm thinking of using any encapsulated PCB transformer available on Farnell.

Please advice.

Btw, Chris i guessed you have read the datasheet (however brief) it is of the Bel's powerline signal coupler. At the last couple of pages with the schematics, at the capacitor it writes 4.7n x2 class. What does x2 class mean? And the 2 resistors 200k, can't they just use a 400k resistor?

Btw, Chris i guessed you have read the datasheet (however brief) it is of the Bel's powerline signal coupler. At the last couple of pages with the schematics, at the capacitor it writes 4.7n x2 class. What does x2 class mean? And the 2 resistors 200k, can't they just use a 400k resistor?

At the Electrical specifications part of the Bel coupler, the parameters of the coupler has this Hi Pot @60Hz 1mA and a value of

Hi, Ant_Magma. One thing at a time.

A real engineering prototype would have one line cord, with the split to the powerline modem and the power supply occurring inside the box. For a proof-of-concept prototype, and for initial work, you can have two plugs. You can always add a small linear or switching power supply later, after you have the thing working. Points off for proof-of-concept as opposed to full engineering prototype, but no points if it doesn't work. You need to get something going NOW.

Whenever you're working with line voltage in an engineering lab environment, you should use an isolation transformer. This is first of all for safety. As an extra benefit, you can realistically step down from 240VAC to 120VAC, which should provide additional safety. I'd rather work with 120VAC than 240VAC. The thing is, you apparently have very little non-SPICE experience, and you're dealing with potentially lethal voltages. You need an isolation transformer for your personal safety. This is also why you need an advisor who has worked with line voltage before, and can keep a watchful eye on this part of the circuit (once you've got it done, you can enclose it and be done with it).

According to the coupler datasheet, it provides 2KV of isolation between the line primary and the secondary. This is pretty much standard for transformers. On paper, you should be fine. The X-10 looked good on paper, too. But I have a vision of your getting to the last couple of days, and a line transient jumps up and smokes your works. Pobre Ant_Magma. Line voltage accidents are usually explosive. Apart from any electrical safety considerations, you don't and won't have the time to fix this if a line transient smokes your prototype in the last week. Do everything you can to keep your prototype safe, and only use it and the other piece of comm equipment with an isolation transformer.

By the way, here's what happens with a hipot transformer test. It measures the coupling between the transformer primary and secondary, and is required for proving isolation from line voltage. This is a standard safety test which is used to get listing from regulatory agencies like UL and CSA.

| .------. ,------. | | )|( | | | )|( | | o------' '------o ^ | | DUT | | | | | |I | | | | | | | | / \\ / \\ | (2KV) ( A ) | \\_/ \\_/ | | | | | | | === === | GND GND (created by AACircuit v1.28.5 beta 02/06/05

The 4.7nF cap they're talking about is one rated for line voltage use. In the event of overvoltage, it's made to be self-healing instead of just shorting out. Don't use a cap which isn't rated for the line voltage you're using. And 200K is a standard resistor value. Also, resistors have a voltage rating as well as a wattage rating. If you apply more than the rated voltage, it may arc over the surface of the resistor, which would cause failure. Using two resistors means you can halve the voltage across each resistor, which might be a good thing -- they're not self-healing. ;-)

On a personal note, I had the pleasure in days of yore to work in a place where they liked to hire one or two undergrads and work them to the bone part-time for peanuts. As part of the deal, they had unofficial use of lab facilities after hours, and the use of all the kibbitzing they could wheedle out of the staff for their senior project. I tried to give them a hand when I could, and had quite a bit of fun working with them. It's satisfying to see students finally "get it".

I'm not qualified to help you here. I've never done a component-level, "from-scratch" network interface. And in order to get an answer to two or three basic questions here, you had to wait over 10 hours. If your project is due in 9 weeks, you've only got about 1500 hours left. You need to get that loop lag down, and get your questions answered now, in quantity, by someone who knows what they're doing. If you wait for the kindnesses of strangers, you'll still be talking at deadline. Get some help, you're out of time.

Actually, the real lesson of the senior project is how to do projects. By doing something enormous by yourself, you get a practical baptism of fire in the gentle art of working under brutal pressure. It's a required part of the engineering skillset.

Good luck Chris

Thx Chris for your advice. Sad to say i'm currently on my own. About the 240/120 isolation transformer i'll have to check with the lab. But i'll definitely put my own safety as the first priority =3D)

I did some designs on my own, taking into account your advice and some other resources that i've managed to find and i was wondering if you could give your opinion on it:

I decided to use a 3-stage protection circuit with a gas discharge tube, a resistor and a MOV (as stated in the Bel coupler datasheet). For the MOV i followed the coupler datasheet and i chose the LITTLEFUSE Varistor 390V 130J (V250LA40B). The gas discharge tube, the EPCOS 350V (EC350X). These parts i chose based on the availability of it in my area.

However, for the series resistor i'm not sure how do i choose the value, that's where i hope you can help me.

Next, i was thinking since my signal is transmitted at 4Mhz-21Mhz, i could probably design a high-pass filter to filtering out everything else. Thus, i designed a 4pF capacitor and 10k=E2=84=A6 resistor to form my high-pass filter.

For the PSU, i decided to take your advice and i'll search for a linear power supply of maybe 10V output then use a LM317 to bring it further down to my operating voltage of 3.3V.

What do you th> Ant_Magma wrote:

my

Hi, Ant. If you don't have an isolation transformer, you're not making safety your first priority.

Don't worry about the resistor at this point. The MOV alone will do for proof of concept stage. Just do exactly what's in the data sheet (4.7nF cap in parallel with 2 ea. 200K resistors). L1 L2 | | | | | | o | 2X200K ( | ___ ___ ) | .--|___|--|___|----. o | | | | | | || | o-----)-------o-------||---------o---. ,- | | .-. | || )|( | | | |/ 4.7nF )|( | | | |MOV .----' '- | | /| | | | | | '-' | | o-------o-----------------' | | | | .-------------. | | | | o-----)---------------o | | | | PS | | | | | '---------------o | '-------------' (created by AACircuit v1.28.5 beta 02/06/05

A 4pF series cap won't work. Your signal will be gone.

Any 6V to 9VDC wall wart that can provide at least 1 amp will give you something you can regulate down to 3.3V with an LM317. If you have time, you can put a small linear or switching power supply on board later.

Please look for another source for help besides newsgroups.

Good luck Chris

m my

Try it and see. Actually, you're not taking the load into account. I know this because the manufacturer uses a 4700pF cap.

Chris

I've worked with varistors before (they called them MOVs), and they're crap. During the period of time where I worked at that place, they completely converted over - they quit buying varistors and replaced them all with transzorbs.

So, yes, you should be using a TVS diode. I'd recommend a bidirectional one, of course. :-)

Good Luck! Rich

The Transzorb or Transil devices should only be used IF properly fused. For example, I would never use a 1.5KE220CA without a fast blo type fuse of 2 amps or less.

MOVs, avalanche diodes, gas discharge tubes, etc all have their place; all are effective. But that means the human must understand the principles behind each device. It is why most all 'accidents' are directly traceable to human failure.

I don't understand why the OP wants or needs protection. If for human safety, then he is missing the point. His reasons for protection do not come with numbers - which was one important fact that I was watching for. Without such parameters, I cannot comment on what is and is not effective protection. I still don't yet see the underlying reasons - the problem - he wants to solve.

BTW, MOVs have highter capacitance. This is why the telcos did not use MOVs > > > I'm building a power line modem.