I don't think there is a Sagnac effect. It is just an interferometer topology. You split the beam and send it both ways through the coil of fiber. (or a ring of mirrors.) And then combind the beams again. If there is rotation about the axis of the coil then the two path lengths (clockwise vs CCW) are different and you get a change in the interference. I've always wanted to try and measure the Earth's rotation this way.
Except that the phase shift is independent of the refractive index, so that doesn't work.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics Electro-optics Photonics Analog Electronics
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
email: hobbs (atsign) electrooptical (period) net
http://electrooptical.net
You don't need the coil of fiber to make a Sagnac, just mirrors will work. It's pretty easy to work out the sensitivity to absolute rotation. (At least I did it once.) It goes as the angular velocity time the area enclosed by the beams times the number of 'turns'. (which is why a coil of fiber lets you win big time.)
We've got a Sagnac on a table top with about a 1 square meter area. I think I estimated that we could see rotations of something like 10 rpm.
George H.
Oh, or are you saying that measuring the Earth's rotation is hard. (I'm just wondering how I'm going to stop the Earth so I can find my 'zero'.)
You completely lost me there - the phase shift should be completely independent of the refractive index, dependent only on rate of rotation, in order to work! And any dependence on index of refraction only needs to be known in order to be compensated for.
That works. Measuring very slow rotations optically is not easy, but is done all the time in both fiber and ring optical gyros. There was a lot published on the details a few decades ago when I still read the SPIE Journal, the most interesting thing being the discovery of a stick-slip friction effect between the counter rotating beams, which would phase lock with each other at very small rotations, making small rotation rates undetectable. The solution was to run the counter-rotating beams at different frequencies, adding a few MHz (IIRC) to one side before injecting it in the loop and then comparing the interference signal from the combined beam detector to the frequency offset signal.
Speaking of interferometry, there was an interesting article in June 9 Laser Focus Workd,
INTERFEROMETRY Emerging applications push receivers to higher speeds OVIDIO ANTON Newport Corp.
Use of autobalanced detectors to monitor the sample and reference beams of an interferometric system delivers high bandwidth with improved gain and reduced noise for applications such as optical coherence tomography. ... We developed the ?Nirvana? autobalanced receiver based on Hobbs? work at IBM. (P. Hobbs, US Patent 5,134,276)
Just in case we were not far enough off topic yet :-).
It would be interesting to take some really sensitive nanovolt-level instrument and see if it's g-sensitive. I think most analog ICs are in fact stress sensitive; I've seen it in DACs and opamps.
No, it's that the Doppler shift explanation doesn't work because if it did, building a Sagnac in a medium of refractive index n would give n times the fringe shift, and it doesn't.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics Electro-optics Photonics Analog Electronics
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
email: hobbs (atsign) electrooptical (period) net
http://electrooptical.net
Doppler shift? It's just a path length difference. (At least that's how I see it.)
I like to think about it with three mirrors and a beam splitter. Wow we even have a picture,
formatting link
If the whole thing is rotating then the photons going one way hit the mirrors sooner and get around the loop faster (in less time). There's certainly a pathlength difference that can be identified. (But I'll leave that as an exercise :^)
If you do the math from that point of view, you get an expression that depends on the speed of light in the surrounding medium, i.e. on the refractive index. This is contradicted by experiment. Try it.
It expired last October. John L and I are working on an updated version.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics Electro-optics Photonics Analog Electronics
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
email: hobbs (atsign) electrooptical (period) net
http://electrooptical.net
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.