Hi:
I recently posted something similar messages. I apologize profusely if anyone is annoyed.
Infra-red C spectrum =3D 100,000 nm to 3,000 nm
100,000 nm =3D 2.9979e12 Hz =3D 2,997,900,000,000 Hz3,000 nm =3D 9.9931e13 Hz =3D 99,931,000,000,000 Hz
Arithmetic mean of IR-C spectrum =3D 51,464,450,000,000 Hz =3D 5825.23388 nm
Due to the above and the inability of the device in
In addition, the emission of the 51,464,450,000,000 Hz light from this laser is constant, non-flickering and non-pulsatile =96 IOW, continuous- wave. The shape of the laser emitting this radiation is square or rectangular depending on the application. In any case, the laser faces downward from the ceiling -- or other "top" -- of an enclosure and emits the IR-C light *downwards* only.
My question is, what would be the disadvantages =96 besides the cost and bulkiness =96 of using this hypothetical free-electron
51,464,450,000,000 Hz for the applications discussed inThanks & Happy Holidays,
Green Xenon