Supply filters

Mar 25, 2020 18 Replies

I'm doing a miniaturized PMT replacement product that has to fit a pHEMT-bootstrapped front end, low noise PGA, variable ~50V MPPC bias supply, TEC controller, MCU, and serial communications into a 22x22x50 mm envelope. (Fun.)



It needs supply polarity and overvoltage protection, but I haven't got anything like enough space for a two-amp polyfuse, and couldn't stand the voltage drop if I had.



Soooo, I'm using back-to-back PFETs controlled by the MCU for the protection circuitry. Largish ceramic caps (4.7 uF 0603) look after ESD sensitivity on the supply lines. (Turns out that you can get reasonably decent ones, at least for low voltages--check out Kemet's C0603C475K9PACTU, which is down only 30% at 2.8V. Most are far worse.)



The MCU itself is powered via an LP2951, which is OK to 30V and has separate polarity protection from an SC70 PFET--no big worries there.



The current issue is the input filtering. Without the conveniently-sized resistance of the polyfuse, it's difficult to control the overshoot and ringing of the LC filter. It's not so bad at inrush, because I can use a PWM to control the two PFETs. (The big inductor is downstream of the PFETs, so it won't see the power-on inrush.) However, if the supply is momentarily interrupted, the turn-on transient could blow up quite a few things.



I'm planning to use a very small unidirectional 3.3V TVS in parallel with the largest inductor (4.7 uH). That way most of the inrush goes through the forward-biased diode, keeping the inductor current down, and the worst of the ringing will be damped by the zener action.



It's not as comfortable as the TVS/polyfuse approach, for sure. Any better ideas?



Cheers



Phil Hobbs


Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com

Hah, 2.2 million in stock at Digi-Key. That's $80k worth, at 3.6 cents each. And they have 880k of the 10-volt version. The datasheet says there's a 10uF version - no inventory.

Thanks, - Win

Power input protection is a chronic problem. Lately I use a 24 volt sacrificial TVS and supply a current-limited 24 volt wall wart and assume disasters will be infrequent.

Polyfuse and TVS is pretty good. It can be teased to fry the TVS, but that takes creative malice.

What's your voltage and current? How much voltage can you lose?

One possibility is to use a depletion fet or an equivalent LED current limiter and a coupled thermistor to shut off the load if it gets too hot.

I have used a thermal-limiting 3t regulator as a current limiter, with the adjust pin open. An RRO opamp would work too for modest currents. But I prefer to not have the first power input device be an IC.

We have used the TI e-fuse things, but I don't like them.

Or use a real fuse!

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc The cork popped merrily, and Lord Peter rose to his feet. "Bunter", he said, "I give you a toast. The triumph of Instinct over Reason"

Careful with LP29xx. I've had them go berserk under certain conditions, such as if the input (drive side) impedance gets too high.

TVS have a large tolerance. In critical situations I use a TL431-based shunt regulator. If currents are low enough then a barefoot TL431. This is often important because some high-speed logic and RF parts can go PHUT when it's just a few hundred mV above abs max. Or worse, they only go partially kaputt and have compromised noise behavior or something.

Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/

+-5V, with up to a couple of amps from the +5 depending on the TEC load. The negative supply is just running op amps and the front end bootstrap, so 100 mA at the most. I really don't want to lose more than 200 mV all told. The FETs and the inductor together are contributing about half of that.

The product is an improved plug-in replacement for a commercial PMT module widely used in biomed instruments, which is why the weird supplies. We'll probably do a follow-on that runs off +5 only. The modules have voltage-programmable gain, which they get by changing the PMT bias. We do it using the MPPC bias voltage and a PGA made from an AD5273BRJZ dpot (1k, 64 taps of which we use 33), an ADA4899 (first stage, gains 1, 2, 4, 8) and an ADA4860 CFA output stage (gains 1 or

8). The dpot is what limits the bandwidth to about 6 MHz.

Our faster MPPC box for the cathodoluminescence application uses a

4-stage switched attenuator instead of the dpot, which is good for 50 MHz or more. That's better than good enough for your average MPPC.

The MCU owns the power supplies, so that wouldn't be hard to do. My circuit is all super tiny packages, except that I'm splurging space on

0402 resistors. It's a pity that all the 1% 0804 quad packs are gone. There's a Sensirion temperature/humidity sensor on the board, so that we can calculate the dew point in case we want to build our own TEC package.

That would need a couple of gigundo TVSes that I don't have space for, and I've only got about half a volt of headroom before I hit the abs max spec on the TMUX1511s I'm using in the PGA. (Remarkable part BTW.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com

Interesting. I've never had a problem with one--I nearly always power small micros off the LP2951-33DRGR, with an NPN booster if necessary. It's good enough for a voltage reference for the sort of undemanding jobs that MCU ADCs are good for--checking the other power supplies, current limits, sloppy digital feedback loops, lowish-performance temperature controllers, and such like.

The TVS voltage isn't critical, because it's across the inductor rather than across the supply. I just want it to be less than 5V on the nastiest peaks. That way the circuit won't blow up if the power supply opens up or we turn off the PFETs suddenly. (The plan is to PWM them during turn-on and turn-off, but it'll probably happen during software development at least.)

Yeah, that would be bad. The TL431 is schloooww, though. I suppose I could just crowbar the supplies if they go more than half a volt out of spec, but that would make me quite unpopular--some instruments will use

32 of these modules. ;)

I thought about just using analogue control of the back-to-back FETs, but they're so tiny that they won't stand much dissipation--the SOA curve is practically indistinguishable from the Y axis. ;)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com
[...]

Too slow for a power rail? Then you seriously need more bypass capacitance :-)

With a shunt regulator set a few hundfred mV above 3.3V there wouldn't be a crowbar effect, it just swallows the peak and then goes back into its guard house.

If the spike comes from a simple connection issue there shouldn't be a SOA concern. Unless of course the cause is a loose contact.

Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/

I don't have control over the input supply. People sometimes power our stuff from truck batteries. It's the peak of the ring waveform I'm most concerned about.

The PFETs are DMP4047LFDE's, which actually aren't super delicate, so you're probably right that I'm being a nervous Nellie about that. I'll see if I can magic up enough board space.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com

These ought to be small enough:

formatting link

Just don't try to hand-solder them :-)

All this almost screams for a shunt regulator. Let it shunt brief spikes and if you suspect longer overvoltages you could do this:

Detect whether the shunt draws current which can be done with a simple BJT plus small resistor. If it draws current for more than xxx microseconds cut the power by shutting off the series FETs.

Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/

They're all 5%, though. :(

I've already got voltage dividers so the MCU can look at the input supplies, so I can just use a dual OC comparator to overrule the MCU signals. Look, ST makes an LM393 in 2x2 DFN!

Thanks for the steer.

Cheers

Phil

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com

I use a resistor across the L to damp ringing but thanks for the TVS idea - cool!

piglet

They're in huge so8 packages, there are some nice sot-23-6 duals, e.g., BSL314PE.

Thanks, - Win

Maybe I have the wrong p/n. The ones I'm using are in 2x2 DFNs.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com

A capacitor coupled to the input with a diode and a pull up on the cap to keep the diode reverse biased normally

During a pulse the cap clamps the surge

Add a resistor to bleed the cap

The Yageo line comes in 1% but long lead times:

formatting link

[...]
Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/

No space unfortunately.

Thanks

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com

Aw, I had the wrong suffix. Three really quite different parts, by changing a few letters at the end.

Thanks, - Win

er ESD

onably

rse.)

l

at inrush,

wever,

oes

d

ny

Is there any difference between a TVS and a couple of power zeners in series? (Well besides the obvious.. one versus two parts.)

George H.

A unidirectional TVS is a power zener. Bidirectional ones look like two zeners back-to-back.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required