science project

On a sunny day (Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:23:55 GMT) it happened Jan Panteltje wrote in :

4$).

Should be, 1 $ was about 4 Dutch guilders of course.

Reply to
Jan Panteltje
Loading thread data ...

formatting link

See?

4$).

Huh? IIRC it was the other way around.

In 1968 I was still in elementary school. I had a Philips EE20 experimenters kit back then but my parents wouldn't allow me to connect anything to mains. I, however, ...

policy

Nah. But semiconductors were pricey back then. 4DM for a BFY90 in the

70's, that ate up my whole allowance. So we did stuff with tubes.
--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

formatting link

Small triacs were only a dollar or two ca. 1970. For example, check out Don Lancaster's "Color Organ" from '69:

formatting link

The whole power board kit with three RCA triacs c/w integral heatsink, including a couple of RTL logic chips, was less than $14 including postage.

Don's earlier version (1966) used SCRs:

formatting link

Perhaps interestingly, about the only electronics components in those designs that are not obsolete are the 1N400x series rectifier diodes.

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

On a sunny day (Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:32:38 -0800) it happened Joerg wrote in :

policy

In the end of the sixties I changed jobs, and had the responsibility for keeping many million dollars of equipment running. No design for a while :-) I never worried about the price of electronic parts... made plenty of money.

Long before that, at school I made some money selling electronics. As a little kid, what electronics I could not buy I would borrow or steel...

Reply to
Jan Panteltje

On a sunny day (Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:41:05 -0500) it happened Spehro Pefhany wrote in :

formatting link

Now that is nice, we do not need no opamps :-)

Reply to
Jan Panteltje

formatting link

SCRs we could always buy. Triacs, very different story. You have to keep in mind that this was in Europe. When my father came back from a biz trip to the US in the early 70's he brought me some magazines and there I was all drooling. The prices you guys got were amazing. Heck, a lone SN7490 cost us kids over four Deutschmarks so I decided my frequency counter had to be cut to six digits and later be expanded to eight when more money was saved up.

It was not much better in the Netherlands where Jan lives because I shopped there a lot. The reason we went was not new parts because they often cost even more there. But they had excellent "dump handelaars" that sold old surplus stuff at much better prices than the German surplus dealers. The was the real source of parts.

You can still get a 0.022uF cap. Except it might be called 22nF in modern speak :-)

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

formatting link

I haven't used opamps much until I was twenty-something and I am very glad for that. You wouldn't believe how many younger engineers are hardly able to do anything on the transistor level these days. Sometimes when explaining a ciruit I have to start pretty much at Adam and Eve ;-)

Among very young ones I even encountered some to whom even opamps where quite foreign. But they were excellent uC programmers. Classical scenario ... "Oh, we need a bigger DSP if we want to do that" ... No, we don't need any processor to do that" ... "HUH?"

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

formatting link

It wasn't too much later. I built a scoreboard for my nephews' hockey team in the early '70s using triacs as seven-segment drivers (60W bulbs for each segment). Triacs were well less than a buck in a piece in tens sorts of quantities then.

Reply to
krw

formatting link

In Europe that took a while longer. I remember that I sometimes inquired back in the 70's but mostly resorted to the old trick, a bridge rectifier and a transistor or SCR. That was also good for some PWM without screwing up the power factor too much. Not that anybody cared about PFC back then but classic triac dimmers cause a lot of annoying buzz.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

:

message=20

from

an=20

He has been around but the basic patent is:

[3] Patent 3,275,909 Granted 9/27/66.

\u201cSemiconductor Switch\u201d.

Even i was a teen by then.

Reply to
JosephKK

:

in message=20

from

might

make an=20

:-)

formatting link

You must have been shopping different places than me. I had bought my = own=20 triac based dimmer by 1968, while still in high school. I think about $4= at=20 the time, i had to scrimp for a month. I still have it and it still = works.

Reply to
JosephKK

formatting link

inside=20

1968.

One of their big drawbacks in acceptance was 3-way lamps. Now with=20 incandescent going away (slowly) triac dimmable lamps are becoming an = issue.

Reply to
JosephKK

message=20

from

an=20

Actually they would "visit" the parents, and only if and when they found = out.

Reply to
JosephKK

message

formatting link

I lived in Europe and anything electronic over there still had early adopter price tags while over here it was probably on the regular shelves at places like Sears. I still remember when my father brought the first pocket calculator back from a trip to the US. We might very well have been the first family in town who owned one, sitting around the table and marveling at that little thing.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

message

When a kid lasered a helicopter out here the pilot must have called in the location with such precision that the sheriff was there almost immediately.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

Youngster!

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
                                             (Stephen Leacock)
Reply to
Fred Abse

When I hear Joseph, or you, or others and then look at my own age I begin to think that this and a lot of other newsgroups will be pretty much gone 20-30 years from now ...

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
Reply to
Joerg

message

Same here in AZ. A kid in Mesa was lasering flights in and out of Sky Harbor. He had done only around six when DPS drove right up to his house. ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |
             
                    Help save the environment!
             Please dispose of socialism responsibly!
Reply to
Jim Thompson

Joerg Inscribed thus:

True ! We're getting closer to the front of the book. ;-)

--
Best Regards:
                     Baron.
Reply to
Baron

JosephKK Inscribed thus:

formatting link

I made a touch sensitive light switch around that time with one.

--
Best Regards:
                     Baron.
Reply to
Baron

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.