Wimshurst, is one design, here's another, it is a Bonetti Machine.
> Then there is the sectorless Wimshurst.
> The metal foil plates of which you speak, do not exist.
>
formatting link
> Other than that, you have overlook fine detail, the direction of force
> is 90 degrees,
and as charge plate approaches the collector,
BULLSHIT. it's not EXACTLY 90 degrees.
Approximations will lead you the wrong way if you're looking for free energy.
the force
> of attraction is equal to the drag of the previous plate moving away.
the charge is less the force is less.
The charged plate is attracted to the opposite pole, when the collector
> aquires that energy, there is an equal amount of attraction developed.
> That energy isn't lost, or gained.
say what?
It strictly straight to the plate,
> and straight away from the plate, the collectors draw on a plate that
> approches, by as much as one that is moving away. There is no gain or
> loss attributed to anything that is parallel to the axis of rotation.
The movemment of charges isn't parallel to the axis.
A magentic field, if lets say north faced north, would oppose the
> direction of rotation, and there would be loss, if there is enough
> inertial energy to get past the magnet, it will only push as hard to
> move it away, and continue rotation in the same direction. With just
> two permanent magnets, there would be a very significant loss at the
> point where the interia of rotation dropped below the field strength of
> the magnets pushing against each other because, at that point, the
> rotation would stop. The force of attraction of north and south poles
> works the same way, except that magnets will center themselves over the
> other aligned.
what have magnets to so with anything here? use shorter sentences if you want to be understood. as it is you are starting to come across as a kook.
The dielectric of the rotating disk, retains the same charge in volts,
> and that field always pulls equal on the Sectorless machines, and
> parallel to the axis of rotation. It pulls on the opposite charge as
> it approches, and pushes on the like charge as it leaves.
The dielectric isn't all that signinficant here,
snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote:
and learn to post correctly.
> The Flavored Coffee Guy wrote:
>> > Therefore, the Wimshurst Machine, is the proof of the existance of a
>> > usuable Zero Point Energy, Generator.
>>
>> no.
>>
>> > But, a
>> > Wimshurst Generator, will freewheel until all of the intertia of the
>> > spin has be degraded by the friction of bearings and brushes have
>> > brought it to a stop.
>>
>> No. like charges attract. separating them takes energy.
>> the disks moving towards the spikey collectors have more charge
>> than when they're moving away from the collectors, (duh!)
>> so there that energy is't regained. the gif you linked to doesn't show
>> that .