It looks like something related was granted in 2012, but its fee status
>is listed as "Lapsed" ;-)
>
>

Nope. Go thee unto: and scroll down to the bottom under "Legal Events". Fees were paid on July 4, 2014 (does the patent office really work on July 4th?). On Mar 22, 2016, it looks like Intersil changed patent attorneys and ownership was transfered. Looks very much alive to me, although still an application.

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com

Bypassing the resistor makes it NOT-LIKE a current source.

Bull-crap! My analysis assumed infinite.

I was fortunate enough to have Harry B. Lee for circuit analysis because I was in the Honors EE program. Thus I didn't have to endure the Guillemin nonsense... so I'm quite comfortable doing nodal and loop analyses.

I suggest you study up ;-) ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |

You assumed the admittance of the right current source was infinite, i.e. a dead short? Well...

It looked to me like the analysis was along the lines of the loop analysis for a diff-pair with a current source in the tail. With a DC-coupled diff-pair drawing say 2mA and a common mode signal, both inputs go up, and the current source draws 2mA. In differential mode one transistor decreases conductance to 1.9mA, the other increases to 2.1mA, and the current source draws...2mA. Its conductance never changes.

If the source's conductance never changes with signal, then from a small signal AC analysis perspective it's fine to treat it as if it has an infinite real impedance (zero admittance.) It's just a DC source.

My point of contention is that it looks like in this circuit the conductance of the right current source must vary with signal. If it does that, then the magnitude of its admittance must be finite, in which case it can't have a infinite (real) impedance.

"NegativeCapacitor.pdf" on the S.E.D/Schematics Page of my website has been updated to include simulations showing the regions of instability. ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |

Small-signal AC analysis is based on a set of assumptions, and my point is that I'm not sure that considering the rightmost current source to have infinite real impedance for AC is a valid assumption. I'm willing to concede that I'm wrong, but I'd like to know why.

I did do an analysis without making the assumption that the AC impedance of the right current source is infinite, and yes it does appear that in the limiting case it reduces to the equation given in the patent. A legible version will have to wait until I pick up more graph paper...;-)

Those skilled in the art will recognize the equations (in the patent) just above and just below [0028], match my derivation, if you make the identity substitution jw==s (I was taught Heaviside notation at about age 20 ;-) ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |

The Laplace transform is a specialization of a more general class of integral transforms all derived from the Fourier transform, though many (like the Mellin transform) don't have much application to engineering.

More generally than that, they're a class of operator on a vector-space of functions.

formatting link

The Laplace variant is preferred in EE because it can operate on many important functions which don't have a finite limit at infinity, like sin an cos, and has a dual space containing transforms of those functions where you don't have to resort to "distributions" which aren't locally integrable, i.e. delta functions etc.

Yes, pretty smart guy to invent the operational calculus. Other mathematicians of the 19th century had similar ideas, but AFAIK never applied them directly to engineering (though the Fourier transform came out of Fourier's research into solving the heat equation on bounded domains.)

It wasn't really until the early 20th century that the theory of integral transforms became formalized.

FilterPro is great. As are the tables in Williams. Either one lets me design a filter in 10 minutes and get on with life.

We have the NuHertz software too. It designs amazing LC filters, using standard component values. I can't imagine how it does that. Trial and test? FilterPro handles standard R/C values, too.

Lots of filters deserve to be Spiced, to account for opamp gbw and slew rates and such.

--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.