I've made a 120 V AC motor speed controller using a Quadrac that doesn't work the way it should. Is it safe to look at the waveforms at various places in that circuit with the scope in the CH1 - CH2 mode and using two probes? Of course, without connecting the probe ground clips to anything on the circuit. I assume this would be OK but I'd hate to fry my scope so I'm looking for some expert advice. I don't have an isolation transformer.
Can you run it at reduced voltage, say 24 or 48 volts AC? An isolation transformer is also a safety factor.
Using X10 probes with the Ch1 + Ch2 inverted should be pretty safe as far as the scope goes. Just watch out that the ground leads don't touch anything.
We have a TPS2024, a fully-isolated 4-channel scope. It's great for this sort of thing... clip any probe ground lead anywhere you like.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
Well, you haven't given much information about neither your circuit nor your problems. But common problems with Quadracs are a rather limited dV/dt rating and that they in general cannot be used in the forth quadrant (or require excessive gate current). The first one leads to unintended triggering, the second one may make your circuit to a kind of rectifier ...
I wasn't asking for help debugging my board, I just wanted to verify that it was safe to poke around on it with the scope probes since it's connected directly to the 120 volt AC line. The subject of my post was perhaps misleading. The speed controller is for a brush AC motor taken from an old vacuum cleaner.
An overview of Littlefuse quadrac devices is found here:
formatting link
In the circuit I'm using the duty cycle is set by a 250K pot. The problem was that the resistance had to be reduced to around 20k before there was any triggering at all. The duty cycle was suddenly changing from zero to around
50 %. I replaced the Q4008LTH with a Q4008LT (that I received from Digi-Key today) and now it appears to be working correctly, the duty cycle can be smoothly varied from near zero to near 100 %. So I guess the LTH device was damaged though how that occurred is a puzzle. I've worn a grounded wrist strap when handling the device. It seems unlikely that it was bad when it was shipped from Digi-Key...
Yep, but we don't know whether the OP knows that. Even if there's a snubber, if it is dimensioned according to rules of thumb for the standard TRIAC circuit, it may not work for Quadracs.
In my experience it happens quite often that people don't pay attention to the polarity of A1 and A2. With a TRIAC based circuit you may get away with this, but not with a Quadrac.
When I was in my teens I disassembled a vacuum cleaner, I attached a rubber sanding pad to the motor. Within about 3/4 second after plugging it in, I had a large welt on my chest where a piece of the exploded rubber pad hit me. I was lucky, the dammage could have been worse. I took the motor to my high school shop class where we had a device to measure rpm. Full speed no load was over 28k rpms. Mikek
** Yep - vac motors are scary things when the compressor fan is removed. Plenty of stories on the web about them exploding like hand grenades as the windings and metal bits come apart at 32,000 Gs.
The classic example of a series-wound motor. Potentially causing parallel wounds.
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.