I think you were working with high-voltage SiC fets.
What sort of fall times can you get at 1KV or so?
I want to switch 6 or 7 KV to ground, fast, into a 50 ohm load, and need to stack fets. The higher the fet voltage, the fewer I need to stack and drive.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement
You could easily get 10ns, faster if you work at it. I've slowed my 600V switch to 8ns to keep it smooth.
Also, 7kV and 50 ohms, with 50-ohm cable, means a current of 70A. Switching that much current is one thing, but trying to do it fast means inductive voltage drops, V = L di/dt, will be a killer. You can work to keep inductance under control with one MOSFET and a ground plane, etc., but when you put them in series, low-inductance paths go to hell.
Dunno, John, that's a very serious game to play. Behlke does it, but they stick to slower speeds.
I'd have to transiently over-drive Vgs hard to turn it off quickly, which might kill it. Folks do that with MOSFETs to overcome gate inductance-- hard, high pulse, then back off the overdrive before the die ever sees the overvoltage.
The literature recommends negative Vgs to keep SiC FETs fully off, and
+20V 'on.' Funky.
Honk! (They're flying over head these days, headed south)
You need to source the (presumable short) 50-ohm coax cable with a 50-ohm back-terminating resistor. That means the switched load is 100 ohms, not 50 ohms. At the far end of coax you see full voltage, as the pulse arrives. The 2x reflected signal goes back to the source resistor and stops the high current draw. But to insure the fast risetime, you need to source the 70A current into 100 ohms, with your desired risetime. That's bad enough!!
I'm driving my SiC with +16 and -3.5 volts. This gives me an acceptable-low Rds(on) and is a tad bit faster than the higher spec'd voltages. Observed Vth = 10V.
Well, 'k' is an exception, as are 'h' and 'da'. Look up 'SI multiplier prefixes'.
Why, oh why, don't we see calculators, spreadsheet programs, numerical programs, etc., etc., accept multiplier prefixes? Spice does it, although it *still* gets 'M' wrong. Gnuplot has some clumsy support for it too, but that's about all I know of.
If you are referring to LTSpice, I think it accepts Meg as a multiplier. That may have something to do with how it discriminates milli from mega disregarding single-letter capitalization. But I think it must be Meg rather than meg.
Spice doesn't care about letter case. Meg or meg will work for
1e6. Spice dates from the time that many computers didn't even have lower case. I'm old enough to remember that era. In this upgrade-crazy world, one would think this could have been fixed by now.
LTspice buffs pay attention now: A capacitor marked 1F is *not*
1 farad. A quirk of the same sort to catch the unwary.
Win, do you cover triacs in your new edition? I was gobsmacked to find there was not even a mention of them in the 2nd for some unaccountable reason. A *very* rare oversight on your part, though, I freely admit.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.