OT: OCD athletics rules

This is ridiculous, from

formatting link
(amendment%20to%20Rule%205) Amendments to Rule 5 of the Technical Rules (formerly Competition Rule 143)

5.1 The clothing must be made of a material which is nontransparent even if wet.

Rule 5.1 of the Technical Rules should be interpreted widely in terms of what “could impede the view of the judges”, including athletes wearing their hair in a particular way.

Athletes may compete barefoot or with footwear on one or both feet.

One-off shoes made to order to suit the characteristics of an athlete's foot or other requirements are not permitted.

5.2.2 Where World Athletics has reason to believe that a type of shoe or specific technology may not comply with the letter or spirit of the Rules, it may refer the shoe or technology for detailed examination and it may prohibit the use of such shoes or technology in competition pending examination. Note (i): At least four months prior to an International Competition at which an athlete proposes to wear a shoe that has not previously been used in International Competitions, the athlete (or their representative) must submit to World Athletics the specification (i.e. size, dimensions, sole thickness, structure etc.) of that new shoe; confirm if the new shoe is to be customised in any way; and provide Amendments to Rule 5 of the Technical Rules (formerly Competition Rule 143) Approved by Council on 15 July 2020, effective from 28 July 2020 Amendments to Rule 5, in force on 28 July 2020 2 information about the availability of the new shoe on the open retail market (i.e. either in store or online). After reviewing this information World Athletics may request that samples of the shoe be submitted by the manufacturer for further examination. If the shoe is requested for further investigation, World Athletics will use reasonable efforts to complete its examination as soon as practicable (if possible, within 30 days of receipt of the shoe by World Athletics). Note (ii): Transition Period 31 January 2020 to 8 August 2021. This note has been inserted in recognition of the fact that on 15 July 2020 a Working Group on Athletic Shoes has been established by Council which by the end of the year 2020, in collaboration with manufacturers, will review the entirety of this Rule 5 as it applies to shoes by the end of the year 2020. The following notes (a) to (e) will assist in guiding all stakeholders with the practical application of this Rule 5 as it applies to all shoes (road or spike shoe) until and including, 8 August 2021.
Reply to
Commander Kinsey
Loading thread data ...

That seems specifically worded to exclude the South African amputee who shot his wife.

Reply to
Jasen Betts

afaik "any technical device that incorporates springs, wheels, or any other element that provides a user with an advantage over another athlete not using such a device" was already banned 15 years ago

there was quite the controversy when he wanted to compete in nondisabled events, don't want to end up in a situation where the chance of winning an Olympic medal requires you to have your legs amputated

Reply to
Lasse Langwadt Christensen

Seems a lot of words to say, if you have developed a shoe that might give you an advantage, we need to inspect it first. Is it OK to wear clothing with electronic adverts on it rotating as you run. Apparently this is now possible. I'm assuming that hair worn a specific way due to the religion would not be affected as this would breach the equality act. Maybe a new streamlined Turban can be designed? Next we will hear that all noises used to start races must be under a certain decibel level to protect the hearing.

Not that it bothers me much, since I'm not in any way going to be an athlete. Brian

Reply to
Brian Gaff

It amused me when they put in a minimum reaction time to say if you started less than 200ms after the starter pistol you cheated, then they realised some people were that quick at reacting.

Reply to
Commander Kinsey

If they can fit it inside the size of a normal shoe sole, what's wrong with it? Why is it any different than a better spongy sole material?

Of course the only real fair way is to either:

1) Make all athletes run barefoot (it's good for you). 2) Give the athletes shoes provided by the event.
Reply to
Commander Kinsey

Number 2 would be good. There are several automobile race car categories similar to the Legends.

formatting link
Tires: 205/60R13 Federal SS595 (pavement) American Racer 13 inch (dirt)

The tires aren't provided but are mandated by the rule book. No super high performance tires developed by people with deep pockets. This was a response to NASCAR. The people wanted to see the driver's skill, not the bank account of his supporters.

Formula One is down to Pirelli as the sole tire supplier but there are eight compounds and an arcane set of rules.

Reply to
rbowman

The trouble is, when all cars are the same it gets boring. I like the anyone can enter races with all sorts of cars, some way faster on the straights, some way faster on the corners, some way better in a slightly bending the rules collision.

Fuck it, forget cars, use buses!

formatting link

Reply to
Commander Kinsey

Yes they are boring. I gave up on NASCAR when they quit rubbing cars that are sold at a dealer. In the late 1960's Cryslar made every dealer take a few cars of a certain kind so they would be legal to race.

The fun days were when the cars were set up to 'cheat' the rules. Like the gas tank could only be so large, but one racer said the rules did not say anything about the fuel line so the line was big in diameter and long. One used his roll bar to hold extra fuel.

Reply to
Ralph Mowery

Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men.

Reply to
Commander Kinsey

I used to go to SCCA (Sports Car Club of America) races at Limerock CT. They would run the classes all at once. It was fun watching the Corvettes run away on the straights, but in the curves and chicanes the Super 7s and Minis would be nipping at their heels again.

I went to one Formula One race and was bored out of my mind. I grew up with short (1/4 mile of less) outlaw dirt tracks. A large set of balls was more important than a large engine. Like hurling the rules were rudimentary.

Reply to
rbowman

There was no NASCAR in upstate New York but you could literally go to a stock car race every day of the week and twice on Sunday. The nearest NASCAR track was in Pennsylvania. NASCAR was always too fancy for me.

Reply to
rbowman

The old days are still here, at least in the more grass-roots racing and drag'n'drive events. It's when big money is involved that things get boring. (Oh, or when the cars are electric.) ;)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Reply to
Phil Hobbs

Those two ideas contradict already.

Is clothing required?

Reply to
John Larkin

It wasn't in the days past, but I believe only men performed in the Olympics.

Reply to
Smolley

And why would women object to being naked more than men would?

Reply to
Commander Kinsey

I would say any clothing impedes movement of the body, so should not be worn.

Reply to
Commander Kinsey

What's wrong with electric cars? More acceleration.

All I ask for is a lot of crashes.

Reply to
Commander Kinsey

Less noise... I remember when the first Wankels came out and purred around the track. No fun. Even now the ones that make noise have been gentled down. When I took my wife to her first stock car race it induced a panic attack as the stands vibrated to the unmuffled engines.

Reply to
rbowman

More floppy bits? I understand sprinting without a sports bra can be uncomfortable (for genuine women)

Reply to
rbowman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.