OK, wanna take the Garage Test?
And there's a HELL of a lot of difference between cigarette smoke and smoke from a house fire.
Cheers! Rich
OK, wanna take the Garage Test?
And there's a HELL of a lot of difference between cigarette smoke and smoke from a house fire.
Cheers! Rich
I believe that "the rapture" is the end of the world the same way that the butterfly is the end of the worm.
Cheers! Rich
"Have
Yikes!
egregious:
Antismokerism,
Garage
couple
the
I'll
out of
on our
Can you find any day where the world population dropped by so much as
1%, let alone the claimed 1/3 of the population? If that happens and you are still around, try posting it, i may still be around.
ct
Indeed I am. My apologies.
And - crucially - this e-mail includes the line
"Date: Thu Feb 3 13:11:46 2005"
which you failed to quote, despite the fact that it make your case crystal clear.
...- Hide quoted text -
Sorry about that. I was thinking about an earlier exchange.
Phil Jones does seem to suffer from a tendency to post without thinking.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
ect
0...No way. Raveninghorde won that one.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
ject
e 30...And Ravinghorde fancies himself as a comedian. It is a pity that he can't do better than clown.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
SNIP
Before being arrogant read the other posts, keep up the prtactice. From another post at 23:32:
/quote
Indeed I am. My apologies.
And - crucially - this e-mail includes the line
"Date: Thu Feb 3 13:11:46 2005"
which you failed to quote, despite the fact that it make your case crystal clear.
quoted text -
Sorry about that. I was thinking about an earlier exchange.
Phil Jones does seem to suffer from a tendency to post without thinking.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
/end quote
SNIP
Thanks for that. especially as I spent 3 hours moving hockey goal posts and umpiring today:)
the
be
"greenhouse
that
downwards.
your
to be
uncontrolled
winds
is
just
Projecting. Hilarious.
based on what Ive seen on Snoman...
This is pretty realistic..though I believe the numbers to be far far too low.
Gunner
"First Law of Leftist Debate The more you present a leftist with factual evidence that is counter to his preconceived world view and the more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot, homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to the subject." Grey Ghost
Three
Indeed it does not. However its a hacked version that I didnt have to pay for and it will cost me money to update..and it would include buffoonish "desks" and other bullshit that I have absolutely no need for.
So Ill simply fumble around with the occasional spelling error and not have to deal with the complex buffoonery that Agent finally became...not because it needed improvement..but because the programmers needed to make the product more expensive.
Gunner
"First Law of Leftist Debate The more you present a leftist with factual evidence that is counter to his preconceived world view and the more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot, homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to the subject." Grey Ghost
First off you don't know to what extent the deniers are funded by industry. I suspect they are providing the dollars behind the majority of it. And knowing that industry exists solely to make profits, I take anything their "research" produces with a rather large grain of salt. Moreover, unlike you, I don't consider that scientists paid with taxpayer funding are paid by politicians. Despite who pays them true scientists don't come up with specific results that their bosses want. But we all can recite stories where "scientists" working for business interests do come up with exactly what the businesses are paying them to find.
Hawke
You mean, besides the fact that it's impossible?
In a way, there's an experiment going on right now - CO2 levels are increasing, and the temperature isn't.
Hope This Helps! Rich
Zero, here. I wish I knew how to collect this alleged funding, but like all warmingism, it's smoke and mirrors.
Hope This Helps! Rich
ubject
n s aone
, 5430...I'll be in goal tomorrow evening for Nijmegen QZ against Druten in Druten, It's just "trim-hockey" meaning that we play to keep fit, and it is mixed, so the standard isn't all that impressive, but it is still field-hockey.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Trust Rich to take the short term view - in the short term the world isn't warming up and he hasn't developed lung cancer.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Hi Charlie,
I should clarify that I when I say "science is not about proof" I mean that nothing is ever proven absolutely true, in the way that perhaps it can be in mathematics for example. So it is unreasonable to ask for absolute "proof" of something before taking action. All that we can ever hope for is to have sufficient evidence one way or the other.
Water vapour comes into equilibrium very rapidly AIUI, i.e. double the amount in the atmosphere and it will all rain out again tommorrow. The corresponding cycles for CO2 take hundreds to thousands of years. The effect from CO2 may be smaller but it is continuous, building up over decades and persisting for millenia.
Methane is indeed a serious greenhouse gas and is included in the models and mitigation planning. (Sometimes I have seen the figures from these other gasses presented as "CO2 equivalent" quantities).
-- John Devereux
I don't understand what you are complaining about here. As you say it is clearly labelled so what is the problem?
-- John Devereux
Perhaps you misunderstood my post. I wasn't denying Bill uses denigration, I was pointing out that Raveninghorde's grasp of easily verifiable facts is woeful. He was claiming that at least 285 (570/2) posts in that thread included Bill calling all non believers idiots. That's nonsense because the total no of posts from Bill in that thread was well short of 285 (easily verified), and of those he did make, not all involved calling all non believers idiots.
-- Regards Malcolm Remove sharp objects to get a valid e-mail address
Hide quoted text -
We can't ignore this gem from Bill who is ranting at an obvious forgery:
Subject: Re: Any Smart DumbAss in here knows How to Increase the Capacitance of Electrolyte Capacitor? Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 04:42:53 -0700 (PDT) From: snipped-for-privacy@ieee.org Organization:
If you weren't quite the ill-informed idiot that you are, you'd know that the dielectric in an electrolytic capacitor is formed by the electrolytic oxidation of the surface of the aluminium foil the forms the plates of the capacitor.
If you reverse bias the capacitor you can reverse this process, making the dielectric thinner ( and more likely to break down). Sadly, the reverse process is unlikely to thin the oxide layer to exactly the same extent at every point, so you run the risk of lowering the breakdown voltage faster than you increase the capacitance.
As cheap goes, this about a poor and investment of your time as you could make - short of slandering me in this user group which however does seem to give you some kind of demented satisfaction - but do try it. You won't enjoy the process at all, but does that worry me?
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
-- Offworld checks no longer accepted!
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.