Lester J Hendershot - The Hendershot Fuel Less Generator

It is always easier for them to play the victim and whine rather than actually take any responsibility for their actions.

I have. I bought one that needed some repairs to meet VA requirements not long after I got out of the Army. The owner didn't have the $8,000 to have the work done, so she knocked it off the asking price. Ii did the repairs for under $2,000 and that saved me over $6,000 which was about 25% of the total price.

And the way you know how much I know about science is? You can Google my house, but you can't Google my brain. So I think I've just proved once more that your opinions are worth just what we pay for them. Zip.

And it's always easier for you to generate the "Big Lie" rather than actually find some references and generate some proof. I know you think that you are so much more clever than the rabble out there that you can fool anyone with a quick burst of bullshit, but methinks you underestimate the public. One day that mistake will be your undoing.

What the hell? Why are all "nutters" right wing? I guess that tells us where you are coming from. Hey Martin, in case you didn't get the memo, your "Envy of the World" the Soviet Union crashed and burned under it's own weight of it's ineffective economic system. But you still think that the system can work if only you YOU and your friends are put in charge this time! And you have the nerve to call someone else nuts? Bwahahaha.

As for the Moon shot, who knows? Maybe the Russians saw the original hi res footage, unlike the rest of the world. Of course man going to the moon really wasn't all that important an event to worry about some old films and tapes. I'd say that some 16mm kinescope recordings ought to be good enough, don't you agree? And anyway the people in charge of data reduction and archiving really weren't all that smart. I mean, they were only ROCKET SCIENTISTS! So please tell me again that you believe all this political bullshit about records being "lost". In my experience, the only time records get "lost" by government is to protect the guilty. Now the only question that remains is "Guilty of what?"

It's sure you'll be the last one to learn because you aren't even asking the right questions let alone looking for answers.

I guess that makes you fat, happy and stooopid.

Why do most of these free-energy inventors have such goofy names?

Well, Philo Farnsworth did invent television...[1]

John

I don't always agree with you , Rich, but in this case, I do.

Isn't it amazing that these "suppressed" devices are readily available, for all to see and replicate, on the net? It appears that Gaby believes the crap that Beardon and Audin serve out and is trying to revive the old, unsubstantiated claims. Why be ignorant if you can't show it appears to be the motto. Actual, properly instrumented demonstrations by independent and competent "third parties"are not wanted by the proposers because measured facts are an insurmountable obstacle to wishful dreams (I would have said "thinking" rather than "dreams" but that does require a minimal knowledge base whiich is not evident).

-- Don Kelly snipped-for-privacy@shawcross.ca remove the x to reply

Repeat after me: "Stupid is as stupid does!"

If you believe in any of this, your knowledge of science is zero. This makes you a sucker for these scams.

Yes, more victimhood and whining. Have you ever considered study and learning? You could stop looking so stupid and gullible.

Thanks for clearing that up.

-----------------

Please don't associate me with Benj or Gaby' s ideas. Benj, I can take up to a point and have respect for some of his views. Gaby is directly out of Keelynet which is a source of pipe dreams (what is in the pipe is another story). I agree wth your response to Benj who has enough background to actually think beyond some negative reaction to "the authorities" He does have a persecution complex which gets in the way of his thinking.

Not all "nutters" are right wing it is just that the US ones tend to be a lot more vociferous on Usenet. Particularly in sci.electronic.design where there are several senile Neocon wingnuts.

You have no idea about my politics.

They intercepted the US mission telemetry in real time the same way the US used to do for Russian missions (though the US had to sometimes borrow Jodrell Bank to do it). At one point it led to a diplomatic incident when the first picture from the surface of Venus appeared on a UK newspaper front page before the Russians had been able to decode it themselves.

I guess you have never met any rocket scientists then. Extremely high intelligence and common sense do not go together. Some bright spark at a place I once worked had an intern throw away all the old drawings for kit made ten or more years ago to make space in the archives. When the gear had a service lifetime of 15-20 years and every one was bespoke it was utter madness.

Untrue. We have plenty of old mainframe magtapes that were not maintained regularly from projects that are long obsolete. If you don't cycle them and refresh after a while magnetic print through renders them pretty much unreadable. Lots of archives have similar issues. I have a few 8" floppy disks with interesting historic stuff on too - but no reader. Lots of people have cut stuff to CD or DVD only to discover the media is not as robust as they though and their "archive" was write only read never. It is astonishing how many people skip the verify step.

Losing the engineering drawings for the Saturn V rocket was a bit bloody stupid but I see no reason to believe that they didn't work. It would have been a stunning demonstration of mass hypnosis to fake a Saturn V launch. Same with the actual Apollo moon landing with the film making technology of the day going to the moon was easier than faking it. Besides I have handled the moon rock they brought back - the kit I worked on was used to date the stuff.

Go off and make your free energy device and quite whining.

Regards, Martin Brown

Knocking something off the price because of a defect is not the same thing at all, or are you saying you offered to pay the full price regardless of if she fixed the defect?

Did she tell you about the $20,000 she had knocked off the price before you even saw the house because of the swimming pool she hadn't yet dug? Would you have paid her for that as well :-)

She was told that no loan was available without the repairs. She couldn't afford to so them. If she had done them, the price of the house would have gone up at least 50% since it was zoned for business, and on a busy highway.. You do the math.

I wouldn't want a swimming pool in a house across the street from a huge elementary school and less than a block from a large middle school.

If that is true, she is stupid.

She could have obtained a short term loan to do the repairs and paid it back with part of that added 50% on the sales price.

But in any case, "ifs" don't count when determining the sales price of something.

A thing is worth what it is worth in the condition it is in at the time of the sale.

You think so?

I was the only one who was interested in the property. It had been on the market for almost six months. The woman had no credit, and was living on welfare. She had three teenage kids. The realtor didn't even want to show it to me, because of its condition, inside. If I hadn't made the offer and bought it, she would have ended up in subsidized housing. This was 35 years ago, before they gave away money to people who couldn't pay it back. The realtor wasn't going to re-list the property. The woman's husband had died two years earlier, and she hadn't bothered to get it through probate. The house was over 100 years old and had a lot of broken windows. She showed me one of her utility bills for over $400. the highest I ever had was under $75, after the repairs. that included the electricity used by my repair business.

I offered what it was worth to me, but if I had know it was going to take over six months for the probate, I would have kept looking and bought something else.

if

Yeah, OK, so she probably couldn't have gotten a fixup loan.

That still has nothing to do with the fact that a thing is worth what it is worth in the condition it is in at the time of the sale.

The looniest belief has to be chemtrails.