Heck, John...I remember him...what was the outcome, because I don't recall any resolution or outcome. Thanks.
Tom
Heck, John...I remember him...what was the outcome, because I don't recall any resolution or outcome. Thanks.
Tom
Thanks John.
Tom
On Mon, 22 May 2006 09:10:16 -0500, John Fields Gave us:
I wasn't boasting. What *I* work on is controlled, not "sensitive". SOME of the other products the company sells *are* secured items.
IP encryption has been around a long time.
We do it in hardware. You or anyone else won't be hacking that any time in the next half century... or longer.
Just look how many decades red and blue encryption has worked, and it still has yet to be compromised.
On Mon, 22 May 2006 14:18:10 +0000 (UTC), snipped-for-privacy@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) Gave us:
I doubt it. The headers show the News service provider that my ISP leases access from. It shows no connection with me at all.
If they were government employees, they MIGHT be able to root it out... If he had a warrant to do so. Any dipshit joe out there, however, will play hell doing so.
2006 01:41:17 EDT)TSU[@I_AO@TOVULY\\BHFOQD@USXB@DTMNHWB_EYLJZ]BGIELLNTC@AWZWDXZXQ[K\\FFSKCVM@F_N_DOBWVWG__LG@VVOIPLIGX\\\\BU_B@\\P\\PFX\\B[APHTWAHDCKJF^NHD[YJAZMCY_CWG[SX\\Y]^KC\\HSZRWSWKGAY_PC[BQ[BXAS\\F\\\\@DMTLFZFUE@\\VL
Yep... No giveaway info there.
Try again.
On Mon, 22 May 2006 11:57:40 -0500, John Fields Gave us:
How many here over the years has attempted to get my real name?
Any successes? No.
I rest my case. I'd also be willing to bet that ThompsonTard used illicit means (as in bad cop) to get info too. I wouldn't put it past the f***er at all.
It seems you are assuming that none of the employees of your ISP or their service providers is a criminal.
In article , Roy L. Fuchs wrote: [....]
You mean none that you know of. If someone used illegal means to find the information, they may not be inclined to show that they have gained the information.
Often the need to protect sources and methods overrides other considerations. In WW2 the brits knew that Coventry was going to be bombed but took no action for this reason.
So, you admit that someone can get the information illegally. The enemy isn't worried about breaking the law. They are only worried about getting caught before they complete their mission.
So the headers do get the enemy one step closer to you, but you claim "no connection" I'm sure that the list of those who lease from the News service provider exists somewhere in their accounting department. That would be the next step.
We aren't talking about "any dipshit joe" we are talking of a well funded enemy with many connections.
In article , Richard Henry wrote: [...]
... and can't be tricked by someone and that a black bag job can't be done and that their computers are truely secure and that the accounting firm they use doesn't have any of the same risks and etc and etc
On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:21:19 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell" Gave us:
You want to stop piracy? Then make it cheaper to buy the product than to copy it. I haven't seen too many people build their own automobiles, TVs, washing machines, etc. Of course, the rouge companies can do it, so go after them!
Al
Are copied or counterfeit cosmetics much of a problem?
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
How about money?
You make your own rouge? I just give my cheeks a little pinch - they pink right up! ;-D
Cheers! Rich
Almost as big a problem as Molex watches...
On Mon, 29 May 2006 15:51:12 GMT, Rich Grise Gave us:
They plug right into your wrist!
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required