Here's How To Handle Junk Mail...

Here's How To Handle Junk Mail...

formatting link
...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Jim Thompson
Loading thread data ...

=A0 =A0 ...Jim Thompson

=A0 =A0| =A0 =A0mens =A0 =A0 |

=A0 | =A0 =A0 et =A0 =A0 =A0|

=A0|

=A0 =A0 =A0 |

Who can mail a first class letter for $0.098 cents anymore?

Reply to
mpm

Who can mail a first class letter for $0.098 cents anymore?

------------------------- Nancy Pelosi is obviously one. Art

Reply to
Artemus

Did you look at the return address? That's who.

Reply to
krw

Congresscritters pay $0.00 .

Reply to
Robert Baer

Here's what I do....

I carefully open everything, especially credit-card offers.

Anything containing a prepaid return envelope is gold. I take some of the contents (absent identifying info), sealf it into the prepaid envelope, and mail it back. The addressee has to pay something like First-Class plus $0.23. I figure they're paying for my time :)

Junk without a reply envelope just gets recycled.

Reply to
Stephan Goldstein

=A0 =A0...Jim Thompson

Has anybody here decoded the 2D barcode on the envelope yet? I often wonder if, when I see those barcodes on envelopes containing credit card offers and the like, whether such barcodes are potentially exposing personal information.

I can see some idiot now in the I.T. department thinking how "useful" it might be to code the envelopes according to someone's Social Security number, or whatever... Given how much data those barcodes can store, they're ripe for abuse!

Reply to
mpm

barcode = ZIP+4

Not as interesting as your friend would like:

formatting link

Reply to
hamilton

Good idea! ...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, CTO                            |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
 Click to see the full signature
Reply to
Jim Thompson

"Jim Thompson" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com...

A better idea is hang a bag for all the junk mail - when its full cram the contents into the nearest mail collection box.

By far, the biggest bulk of junk mail is addressed "The householder", so nothing to identify the person disposing of it.

Any junk mail addressed to me, goes through the shredder.

Reply to
ian field

That's not a 2D barcode. 2D barcodes can carry k-bytes of info, similar to a smart card.

Anway, the secret ZIP+48 code includes your exact address, SSN, birthdate, driver's license, dog license(s), and sexual orientation.

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

Junk w/o a reply envelope goes into anybody elses reply envelope. Art

Reply to
Artemus

Freepost adressesed envelopes are fun.

Cut them out and paste them onto concrete paving slabs and hand them in at the PO callers counter.

Reply to
ian field

The congresscritter pays nothing but I believe the taxpayer does pay the USPS (that stamp on the subject junk mailing) for the franking.

Reply to
krw

=A0 =A0 =A0 ...Jim Thompson

e quoted text -

Are you sure that's not a 2D barcode? I thought that was a PDF417 (Maybe PDF471?) barcode. I'm not talking about the postnet one-liner (usually found along the top or bottom edge of the envelope lengthwise). I agree, that can't hold more than a dozen or so bytes.

-mpm

Reply to
mpm

Pasting them on wrapped bricks is nicer. The recipient may well be suspected of drug running.

mike

Reply to
m II

=A0 =A0 =A0 ...Jim Thompson

e quoted text -

Looks like either Data Matrix or PDF417 Here's what one online 2D barcode decoder says is encoded in the barcode (next to the postage): I should grab some junk mail from the counter, scan those codes, and see what's really in them... (Yeah, like I have time to do that..!!!)

- Ok

- 268435456 =FF FF00E9CDAD21E4146A6200000000303044454D4F 0 15 129 13 19 348 21 354 128

Reply to
mpm

..and the SECOND time you get junk mail from the same place, add plenty of scrap paper or a sheet of galvanized tin cut to fit the return envelope..they can wind up paying a few dollars in postage fees. Just do not add too much weight as they may refuse it.

Reply to
Robert Baer

Does adding some white powder (such as wheat) into the return envelope still cause a massive fuss in the USA as a few years ago ?

Reply to
Paul Keinanen

=A0 =A0 ...Jim Thompson

=A0 =A0| =A0 =A0mens =A0 =A0 |

=A0 | =A0 =A0 et =A0 =A0 =A0|

=A0|

=A0 =A0 =A0 |

Mail fraud is a federal felony.

Reply to
Richard Henry

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.