Giuliani Is A Moron

No, dims is a transitive verb, as in 'this knob dims the dining room lights'. That wasn't the intended word. Heck, it was YOUR intended word, you shouldn't need me to tell you that

Reply to
whit3rd
Loading thread data ...

:

te:

A normal person would think that learning the process would be preliminary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,00

0 votes!

ining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the us ual New York kickback of course.

a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn't yet been filed reflects more on you than Giuliani.

s every

olding a

re some kind

em to be

s that it occurred MUST be investigated. Otherwise, Biden's election will A LWAYS have an asterisk by it.

e, though it isn't on the books under that name under US federal law.

in it for the last FOUR YEARS!

t bothered suing anybody recently. You should have looked up the word befor e you went to your keyboard.

ts have been pushing the Russian collusion hoax and impeached Pres. Trump.

You idea of what has been going on on this planet, is strange.

The Mueller " Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the

2016 Presidential Election" was about Russian interference in the 2016 Pres idential Election which did happen, and could well have been decisive. Part of that was Russian intelligence contacts with the Trump election team, wh ich got noticed by people whose job it was to keep tabs on Russian intellig ence activity in the US, and that's what got the whole investigation going, back when Obama was still president.

Trump likes to make a fuss about the fact that it acquitted him and his tea m of active collusion. Some of his team did go to prison for Easter Europea n contacts that they should have reported, and hadn't, but the main conclus ion was that the Russians had spent quite a bit of time and money trying to get Trump elected.

This wasn't anything like barratry on the Democrats part - they'd had to ha ve sued the Russians for it to qualify, and the Russians didn't spend any t ime or money defending themselves against it.

That's a perfectly legitimate legal counter to Republican attempts to make voting by mail more difficult.

More of the same.

011210427

Republicans have long history of making it difficult for likely Democrat vo ters to actually vote, and the Democrat Party does use legal action to prev ent the worst examples of Republican cheating. There's nothing frivolous about it, and it clearly doesn't intimidate Repu blican-controlled voter registration organisations anything like as effecti vely as anybody interested in fair elections might hope.

wsuits.

All that means is that the Republicans cheat a lot, which in turn reflects the fact that it's easier to discourage poor people from voting than it is to discourage rich people.

You really don't understand what "barratry" is.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

ollusion hoax and impeached Pres. Trump. Other lawsuits by the Dims include ...

nnounced, just

ve uncovered collusion.

with barratry, and

President, for performing

ever, visit Congress

It's a word you like to use when you are being rude about Democrats. Use it once, in the right context, and it might be funny. Use it all the time and you look like the idiot you are.

vestigation (homework assignment: go read the Horowitz report).

They didn't. Trump likes to claim something like that, but he's lying (as h e does a lot of time).

You'd have to be a brain-damaged as Flyguy is to come to the conclusion tha t Flyguy is trying to peddle here.

Of a rather unusual kind. "Barratry" is a pattern of behaviour, and you don 't impeach presidents often enough to make a habit of it.

In fact Trump was impeached for trying to withhold money voted by Congress in the hope of pressuring the Ukraine to set up a bogus investigation into Hunter Biden to help Trump's chances against Joe Biden in the recent electi on. There's no doubt that he did exactly that, and the Republican Senate's refusal to even look at the evidence that he had was a disgraceful derelict ion of duty.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

Wrong AGAIN! It is NOT "dims" - it IS "Dims," a noun.

Reply to
Flyguy

:

te:

rote:

d. A normal person would think that learning the process would be prelimina ry to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 700,

000 votes!

maining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with the usual New York kickback of course.

is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn't yet been filed reflects mor e on you than Giuliani.

ers every

holding a

uire some kind

seem to be

ges that it occurred MUST be investigated. Otherwise, Biden's election will ALWAYS have an asterisk by it.

ime, though it isn't on the books under that name under US federal law.

ed in it for the last FOUR YEARS!

n't bothered suing anybody recently. You should have looked up the word bef ore you went to your keyboard.

rats have been pushing the Russian collusion hoax and impeached Pres. Trump .

e 2016 Presidential Election" was about Russian interference in the 2016 Pr esidential Election which did happen, and could well have been decisive. Pa rt of that was Russian intelligence contacts with the Trump election team, which got noticed by people whose job it was to keep tabs on Russian intell igence activity in the US, and that's what got the whole investigation goin g, back when Obama was still president.

eam of active collusion. Some of his team did go to prison for Easter Europ ean contacts that they should have reported, and hadn't, but the main concl usion was that the Russians had spent quite a bit of time and money trying to get Trump elected.

have sued the Russians for it to qualify, and the Russians didn't spend any time or money defending themselves against it.

e voting by mail more difficult.

01011210427

voters to actually vote, and the Democrat Party does use legal action to pr event the worst examples of Republican cheating.

ublican-controlled voter registration organisations anything like as effect ively as anybody interested in fair elections might hope.

lawsuits.

s the fact that it's easier to discourage poor people from voting than it i s to discourage rich people.

LOL! Hey SL0W MAN, your "argument" is it is OK for Dims to file lawsuits, b ut not OK for Republicans to do the same!! You are SO brainwashed you are b eyond hope!!!

Reply to
Flyguy

Flyguy getting petulant about a pathetic word play that he has long since flogged to death.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

collusion hoax and impeached Pres. Trump. Other lawsuits by the Dims inclu de ...

announced, just

have uncovered collusion.

n with barratry, and

e President, for performing

owever, visit Congress

it once, in the right context, and it might be funny. Use it all the time a nd you look like the idiot you are.

investigation (homework assignment: go read the Horowitz report).

he does a lot of time).

hat Flyguy is trying to peddle here.

on't impeach presidents often enough to make a habit of it.

s in the hope of pressuring the Ukraine to set up a bogus investigation int o Hunter Biden to help Trump's chances against Joe Biden in the recent elec tion. There's no doubt that he did exactly that, and the Republican Senate' s refusal to even look at the evidence that he had was a disgraceful dereli ction of duty.

Hey SL0W MAN, for your edification, filing a lawsuit in the US is a RIGHT, it is how we peacefully resolve disputes (not sure about OZ which is a weir d monarchy). And the Dims, as I have shown, do it FAR MORE often than the R epublicans.

Reply to
Flyguy

e:

te:

e:

rote:

sed. A normal person would think that learning the process would be prelimi nary to filing lawsuits claiming fraudulent ballot voting to the tune of 70

0,000 votes!

remaining in the campaign war chest on a bunch of phony legal fees, with th e usual New York kickback of course.

e is a moron. Commenting on a lawsuit that hasn't yet been filed reflects m ore on you than Giuliani.

wyers every

rs holding a

equire some kind

t seem to be

arges that it occurred MUST be investigated. Otherwise, Biden's election wi ll ALWAYS have an asterisk by it.

.

crime, though it isn't on the books under that name under US federal law.

aged in it for the last FOUR YEARS!

ven't bothered suing anybody recently. You should have looked up the word b efore you went to your keyboard.

ocrats have been pushing the Russian collusion hoax and impeached Pres. Tru mp.

the 2016 Presidential Election" was about Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential Election which did happen, and could well have been decisive. Part of that was Russian intelligence contacts with the Trump election team , which got noticed by people whose job it was to keep tabs on Russian inte lligence activity in the US, and that's what got the whole investigation go ing, back when Obama was still president.

team of active collusion. Some of his team did go to prison for Easter Eur opean contacts that they should have reported, and hadn't, but the main con clusion was that the Russians had spent quite a bit of time and money tryin g to get Trump elected.

o have sued the Russians for it to qualify, and the Russians didn't spend a ny time or money defending themselves against it.

ake voting by mail more difficult.

0201011210427

t voters to actually vote, and the Democrat Party does use legal action to prevent the worst examples of Republican cheating.

epublican-controlled voter registration organisations anything like as effe ctively as anybody interested in fair elections might hope.

n lawsuits.

cts the fact that it's easier to discourage poor people from voting than it is to discourage rich people.

r Republicans to do the same!! You are SO brainwashed you are beyond hope!! !

Not exactly. My argument was that it was okay for Democrats to file law sui ts against Republicans who are breaking the law. I didn't post anything abo ut Republican's doing the same sort of thing.

The "barratry" point was all about Trump's behavior, rather than that of ot her Republicans. The current Republican law suits alleging that some of ele ctoral contests that Trump lost weren't counted properly aren't barratry ei ther. They do seem to be futile, frivolous and stupid, but that's a differe nt issue, and not one you'd know anything about. If you had enough brain t o wash, you might be described as brain-washed, but stupid is the adjective that describes you perfectly adequately.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

an collusion hoax and impeached Pres. Trump. Other lawsuits by the Dims inc lude ...

er announced, just

d have uncovered collusion.

ion with barratry, and

the President, for performing

however, visit Congress

e it once, in the right context, and it might be funny. Use it all the time and you look like the idiot you are.

y investigation (homework assignment: go read the Horowitz report).

as he does a lot of time).

that Flyguy is trying to peddle here.

don't impeach presidents often enough to make a habit of it.

ess in the hope of pressuring the Ukraine to set up a bogus investigation i nto Hunter Biden to help Trump's chances against Joe Biden in the recent el ection. There's no doubt that he did exactly that, and the Republican Senat e's refusal to even look at the evidence that he had was a disgraceful dere liction of duty.

peacefully resolve disputes (not sure about OZ which is a weird monarchy).

Australia is a constitutional monarchy - nothing weird about that, as there are plenty of them around the world, and most of themare good deal more de mocratic than the US.

Since I've long been aware that almost everybody has a right to file a laws uit - they mostly need have enough money to pay lawyers to do it for them - your information didn't edify me at all.

icans.

That's because the Republicans are a lot more enthusiastic about using ille gal tricks to make it more difficult for likely Democrat supporters to vote . They've been making a habit of it for many years now. Jeb Bush essentially won Florida for his brother in 2000 by purging loads o f Democrats from the Florida electoral rolls, and that wasn't by any means the first example.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Reply to
Bill Sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.