Now consider the "pots" in a system, not in isolation. Put a low-impedance load on it. The wiper resistance certainly does matter.
Now consider the "pots" in a system, not in isolation. Put a low-impedance load on it. The wiper resistance certainly does matter.
So, a matched pair of JFETs, one sets gain and the other for feedback. This trick only works on low potential swings, but a few percent of a 250 mV swing qualifies nicely. Alas, the occasions to do this kind of thing are few, and matched-pair JFETs are not a common item. Digikey gives you the choice of PMBFJ620 or nothing.
That's the whole point of the circuit. It's an integrating temperature servo that forces all three arrays to have the same temperature.
If one of the NPNs saturates, its dissipation goes to near zero, and the others warm up to match. In steady-state, the V_CEs adjust themselves so that the dissipation in each array is just what's required to bring them to the same temperature. That's why it's so cute.
Early voltage limits the low-frequency gain--a 2-mV V_BE error produces about 9% change in collector current. With a V_A of 50V, that corresponds to about a 4.5 V change in V_CE, which at 5 mA I_C corresponds to 22.5 mW change in dissipation at DC. So it isn't quite an integrating servo--it needs a bit of help. A bit of positive temperature feedback would work, but it's probably easier and more stable to us an auxiliary temperature control loop to supply the missing low-frequency gain.
The servo actually drives the array temperatures to the point where the Delta V_BEs are exactly the same. Due to slightly different emitter areas and R_EE' values, that won't quite correspond to Delta T = 0. Elsewhere in the circuit I'm measuring Delta V_BE as a function of collector current on the other array transistors, so it isn't too hard to put a millivolt or two on each base to account for that.
What I like about the circuit is that it can force as many arrays as needed to have the same temperature, with almost no additional circuitry, and that it responds fast enough to compensate for the dynamic dissipation in each of the arrays.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
ance
ext -
OK. there's always at least one wiper in the low impedance path.
George H.
One other thing--there is one possible start-up problem. If one NPN starts out significantly colder than the others, its I_C will be too low, and its corresponding PNP current source will saturate, so that its I_C will drop, so its dissipation may not be enough to bring it back into range. The auxilary slow loop will take care of that too.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Even so, as long as the dpot in the low impedance path can drag the tap point at least 8% low, I can get the fine adjustment from the other one, which is why it's clever. (I missed it the first time round, as I said.)
The only problem is whether the variation of the wiper resistance is something manageable.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
-- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal ElectroOptical Innovations 55 Orchard Rd Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 845-480-2058 email: hobbs (atsign) electrooptical (period) net http://electrooptical.net
Well, it works, with a thermal control bandwidth faster than 1 kHz. See "Gain Tweak from SED" on alt.binaries.schematics.electronic.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
output.
net
in
Its in the fridge waiting for people to show up!
-- Failure does not prove something is impossible, failure simply indicates you are not using the right tools... nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.) --------------------------------------------------------------
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.