Spice voltage sources are infinitely powerful; wall warts aren't. Lots of switchers have soft-start, too.
Spice voltage sources are infinitely powerful; wall warts aren't. Lots of switchers have soft-start, too.
n
ut
tI've got a copy of the second edition ISBN 0-07-052236-7
The chapter on magnetics is comprehensive, and even covers the skin effect, and the "proximity effect" which I've never heard of before. Pedagogically , it's rubbish - almost as bad as Snelling. The author assumes that the rea der understands the basics, and concentrates on the complicated detail.
I think the torture-test is powering up the wall wart and then plugging it into the box. There'll be the usual polyfuse, whose cold resistance helps a bit, and I suppose I could do something fancier like a resistor parallelled by a MOSFET controlled by the POR chip, but that's way too fancy for just a few watts.
It's really the 1N4148s or BAV99s or whatever little diode I use that will be the issue--the turn-on surge will divide between the main -15V reservoir cap and the charge pump caps more or less proportionally with the size of the caps (neglecting ESR and diode drops). So I may use a much bigger reservoir cap and smaller charge pump caps, followed by RC filters ahead of the cap multipliers. Alternatively, just putting 50 or
100 ohms in series with the charge pumps will protect them OK, and will only cost a volt or two.It's better from a certification standpoint if the voltages inside the box never exceed 60V even in fault conditions, so I'll need to put zeners on the +-45V outputs, so that even with an out-of-spec input voltage and the transzorb at its upper spec limit, I don't get over 60V.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
That's what most books about advanced technologies do. If they didn't then most of the forests on this planet would be depleted by now :-)
But seriously, a person with lacking EE basics should not be designing switchers without first becoming proficient enough, that's something the pros should do.
That's a buck. If you already have a -15V switcher in there, why not hook into that as you had outlined earlier?
I'm using it as an inverter, i.e. grounding the far end of the inductor and letting it pump its ground pin down to -15V. Works fine.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
That's what I was noticing... it's a switch current limit, not an output current limit. But probably safe. ...Jim Thompson
Yup. It's the inrush that tests your specifications ;-) ...Jim Thompson
Yes, that's the old MC34063 method. But watch out for noise and loop stability.
You might want to reconsider and add soft-start to your "cartoon"....
Subject: Hobb's Cartoon (SED) - HobbsCartoon-with_CL.png Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:19:26 -0700 Message-ID:
Using the LM2594, you're sort of caught between a rock and a hard-place... large load (on LM2594) capacitor, huge peak currents on your add-on inverter, smaller capacitor... sag your 16V. ...Jim Thompson
Not sure what you did for this post but it came through as a file attachment. No copy - paste, just click it and open into LTSpice. Cool.
Alternatively you might be able to provide an over-voltage lockout. TL431 -> input goes above 18V -> pulls current -> robs current from enabling circuit that serves pin 5 -> switcher goes silent. Pages 29/30 in the datasheet:
P.S.: Didn't you mention you wanted to place cap multipliers at the 45V outputs? Then you could hang zeners off of the bases, which would limit things.
In my boost-doubler, I just replaced a BAV23S with a couple BAT46W's, and picked up a bunch of efficiency.
In a 9-to-48 volt boost converter, I was seeing over 100 volt spikes at the fet drain, blamed on forward conduction delay in the PN diodes. The BAT schottkies clamp hard at 48.
I used to do that on Supernews, but they now reject posts with attachments, even text. I got an eternal-september.org account as well, and they apparently allow attachments. Good news.
That's pretty sensible. I'm planning to have the processor control the
+-15V and HV supplies, but a bit of (inexpensive) belt and suspenders never hurts.Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Nice part--like a 100V BAT54. That's a keeper.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
oK, Here is a duh question, When in LTSPICE, how do you save that top level *.asc file you show above?
Thanks, Harry
I don't think a wall-wart is going to look like 2 Ohms... it's going to be current limited... even if it is made in China ;-) ...Jim Thompson
There are a couple of methods.
(BTW you should get a real newsreader and a (free) Eternal September account--lots of people round here killfile anyone from Google Groups because of the spam and the zillions of blank lines.
If you have an eternal-september.org account, you can just use your mailer and attach the .asc file as you would any other file.
Otherwise, open the .asc file in a text editor, and cut-n-paste it into your post.
Mike Engelhardt understands the goodness of human-readable files!
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
The 2 ohms is the initial resistance of the polyswitch in the input protection network. Quite a lot of computer wall warts have a big cap at the output, leading to crackling sounds when you plug them into the back of the machine. Anyway, their current limits will be up in the 5A range, which is way above what my little switcher will allow through on a steady state basis.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required