Curious

Dec 20, 2021 Last reply: 2 years ago 63 Replies

Oh, there's population pressures and land depletion issues also; the old days when a tribe could move into new territory, and herders find fresh pastures, and loners could forage in the wild, conferred a bit of safety that city-bound populations don't have.

Blaming 'bad politics' might be a cheap shot; which is the cause, and which the effect? Economics of limited resources are subject to Malthusian logic. Politics is always involved, but so is gravity, and air, by the simple mechanism of ubiquity in human life.

So do right-wing politicians. The US has more poverty than Sweden. John Larkin won't be able to process this. He liked what Donald Trump did to the US economy, because the effect on his business was positive. Less well-off people were less impressed.

Does the climate change suddenly in the dmz between the Koreas?

formatting link

Well, it's another ubiquitous influence. Most poverty, though, isn't represented by North Korea. There's a bit of international market presence of goods from that little principality, the economy isn't a simple wreck.

formatting link

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required