Comparators vs. op amps

Sep 30, 2007 21 Replies

Tschaggelar

stages.

I'd have to do some digging, but there is a classic equation that relates the speed of the comparator to the number of stages. Generally more stages are faster if you are using the comparator in its "linear" region, i.e. close to zero volts. It is not a situation where you are propagating logic, but rather you have a number of stages moving linearly a the same time, each one amplifying the other. If you want more bandwidth, you use less gain per stage, but more stages. This way written up generally in strobed comparator design, when you off-set cancel each comparator stage in one phase, then compare in the next clock phase.

Of course, now I made a fine mess for myself since I need to dig a reference on this.

On a sunny day (Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:59:20 -0700) it happened snipped-for-privacy@ieee.org wrote in :

I used it in a small oscilloscope design, where it did the trigger level, and also the delayed timebase slice IIRC. That was a < 5MHz oscilloscope, my second :-) the first one had tubes, and the first one I did with dual timebase. I am not sure if it used DTL logic or RTL..... DTL I think.

There was a related IC to the ua710, the ua711, it had 2 comparators, so you could make a window comparator. I liked those chips, they saved many transistors.... reproducable.

Yes LM??? rings bells of limited to VLF applications ;-)

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required